Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Educational Knowledge - Can Chinese public education be refunded on time within 45 working days?
Can Chinese public education be refunded on time within 45 working days?
Can't refund the fee on time. Their standard is 45 working days, 5 working days a week later and 20 working days a month. In other words, you have to wait at least two and a half months for your 45 working days refund.

But usually, it won't come down for two and a half months.

Because there is another requirement for Zhonggong to look at the final admission list. The words of civil servants are often half a year. Career planning is usually half a year.

If you plan to refund the fee halfway, you will deduct a lot of class fees and tuition and miscellaneous fees. And you have to wait a long time, at least half a year to get the money.

1. For the general written test agreement class, the application for refund of fees can only be submitted after the shortlist of all batches is publicized;

2. For the general interview agreement class, the application for refund of fees can only be submitted after the examination is conducted and the list of persons to be hired in each batch is publicized;

It usually takes about 30-45 working days. For details, please contact your customer service teacher to inquire about the refund process when you apply for class.

First of all, talk about the agreement class. When there is no agreement class, the market is relatively depressed, with an annual growth rate of only 8%. However, after the emergence of the agreement class, the annual growth rate suddenly increased to 30%. It is conceivable how big the market of the agreement class is, so when you signed up for the class, the teachers in the marketing department signed up for the agreement class. Since this agreement class does not retreat, its price will definitely go up and become a blatant price increase. Generally, it is about 1.5 times more expensive than ordinary classes. In fact, there are very few famous teachers in China, so the teachers in the agreement class are actually the same as those in the ordinary class. I think it's not reliable, but I just came down. At the same time, the agreement class also has gambling elements. According to data analysis, the success rate of class registration is generally around 70%. So even if you sign up for the agreement class, you will get a refund, but there are seven or eight people in the same class, and the extra money they pay will make up for your quota income, so the training institution will not lose money anyway.

For the students in the dispute over the refund of fees in Chinese public education, even if the arbitration award supports the claim for refund, the fees paid in advance are too high, and there is still the risk of being successfully recovered. If you want to defend your rights through the court, it is suggested to file a lawsuit with the court to confirm the validity of the arbitration agreement and try to confirm that the arbitration clause in the contract is invalid or invalid. After success, you can bring a lawsuit to the court for a refund, which will greatly reduce the cost of safeguarding rights.

If the Chinese public education fulfills its obligation of prompt and explanation, the arbitration clause can become the content of the contract. Does it belong to "unreasonably exempting or lightening its own responsibility, aggravating the other party's responsibility, limiting the other party's main rights and excluding the other party's main rights"? Yes, the reason is that the refund amount is not proportional to the arbitration acceptance fee, and the arbitration clause actually limits the right of students to ask for a refund through judicial channels.

legal ground

Article 496 of the Civil Code stipulates, "If a contract is concluded by standard terms, the party providing the standard terms shall follow the principle of fairness to determine the rights and obligations between the parties, and take reasonable measures such as exempting or lightening their responsibilities to remind the other party of the terms that have a significant interest in the other party, and explain the terms according to the requirements of the other party. If the party providing the standard terms fails to give prompt or explanation obligations, so that the other party fails to pay attention to or understand the terms with which it has a significant interest, the other party may claim that the terms will not become the content of the contract. "