Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Educational Knowledge - How about 5 1talk?
How about 5 1talk?
5 1 talk worry-free English training from preschool to junior high school is good.

The courses of 5 1talk cover preschool to junior high school. ? From the perspective of curriculum arrangement, it is more suitable for children with exam-oriented needs to emphasize oral English in the early stage and increase reading and grammar in the later stage. In terms of learning content, the vocabulary of each stage is gradually improved, but the vocabulary improvement of the following courses is obviously insufficient.

The course is divided into four levels: enlightenment, introduction, elementary and intermediate. The curriculum in the enlightenment and introductory stage focuses on cultivating children's listening and speaking ability, and reading and grammar are added on the basis of listening and speaking at the primary and intermediate levels. From this perspective, the curriculum design meets the requirements of exam-oriented education. If you just want to cultivate your child's oral ability, there is no need to apply for an intermediate class.

From the ability description of the curriculum system, all stages of 5 1talk can reach the ability description under CEFR.

However, the distribution of course learning density is unreasonable and the learning span is too large. The completion time of the whole course is 1 1 year, from children's enlightenment to junior high school. This requires parents' attention and careful consideration when enrolling in courses. Try to avoid reporting to large classes at one time, and then report to classes according to the children's learning situation at each stage.

The classroom of 5 1talk has complete learning, practice, testing and auxiliary links, and children can have a strict learning closed loop here. From the content design of courseware and classroom interaction, immersive experience can make children better integrate into the classroom and have certain output and training.

But the main energy in class is still reading, and the listening and speaking part is not enough. In addition, classroom teaching and interaction are mostly limited to courseware, and classroom development is not rich enough. ? Taking courseware content design as an example, students are required to master single new words when learning words, and the higher requirement is the sentences derived from new words in courseware, such as: What are they? Is it?