Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Educational Knowledge - Is it really scientific to raise children for old age?
Is it really scientific to raise children for old age?
Raising children can really prevent old age.

Song and Chen's "Shilin Guangji": "Raise children to prevent old age and save food to satisfy hunger." .

Since ancient times, China people have provided for the elderly through their sons, so it is understandable that there has always been a market for raising children to prevent old age. The world is changing too fast, faster than people's ability to accept ideas, so many people still can't fully accept raising children to prevent old age.

First, pensions depend on the state.

In fact, the country has already made plans for everyone, but the world is changing too fast, so the old-age care strategy changes again and again.

Finally, it is fixed in "self-care". Indeed, the country can't rely on old-age care, it can only rely on itself.

Second, providing for the aged depends on children.

If the education is good, a daughter can support the elderly, but if the education is not good, a bunch of children will still replace the elderly, and it is meaningless to entangle the number. This sentence also applies to sons. As you can imagine, in order to support the elderly, it is sometimes not as feasible to have more children and girls as just one. The so-called fewer children are more filial, and the only child is more reliable. Most people who don't adopt their parents are families with many children, especially in rural areas. I don't know why many rural people don't adopt their parents.

It is good to have a filial child, but it is useless to have a football team if you are not filial. Not all children will try to bear the responsibility of support because their parents have no pension. Whether you can support your parents has nothing to do with how many children you have, but only with how many well-educated children you have.

Children are better than daughters.

Aunt Lan has only one daughter and is very capable. It's career-oriented. Aunt Lan and her husband retired and lived by themselves. They chat with their children every Saturday and Sunday. Such a living condition is very satisfying. She doesn't want her children to give Aunt Lan living expenses. The children said: when they are old, they will move to a place with her. She will give them a pension if they don't want to. The son-in-law is also very good and reasonable.

Third, pensions depend on money.

To put it bluntly, there are no biological children around you who have more money. Mainly depends on who pays, and pension is a matter of money. How many families have parents, children and themselves? There are fewer children and no one to support the elderly, but there are many family property disputes and contradictions!

That's true. When money is not a problem, everything can be solved. Life will be stable and moist. If parents are willing to spend their own money, children will not interfere with their parents' pension money. In fact, every parent has money to support the elderly when he is old. Old parents have saved money for decades, so it is appropriate to hire nurses and nannies with their own money and the money from selling real estate. The old man spends his money on himself, fearing that he is reluctant to spend his parents' money on his parents.