Write an article about the feedback of new employees in banks on warning education.
First, he relaxed the transformation of his world outlook, which led to the vacillation of his ideals and beliefs and the degeneration of his thoughts. But the ideological education is not solid, and the pertinence and effectiveness are not strong, which is also one of the important reasons for their mistakes. (For example, organizing employees to see Liu Jinbao's case this time is not targeted, and it is difficult to receive any practical results. Ask employees to write down their feedback. Hehe, it can be said that the deepest feeling of employees is that those in power are too dark and don't care about collective interests and employee interests at all. Secondly, China is in a period of system transformation, structural adjustment and social change. Because the system and institutional mechanism in some fields are still not perfect, all kinds of corruption have an opportunity. This is the objective reason why corruption is prone to occur frequently. Third, the supervision mechanism of some departments and units is imperfect, supervision is absent or a mere formality, and supervision work is ineffective. In the current banking operation mechanism, a series of rules and regulations and corresponding incentive and restraint mechanisms are not absent, and the corresponding functions of discipline inspection, supervision, audit, supervisor and risk management have not yet been established. Even if the corporate governance framework under the developed market system has already been established (such as BOC Hong Kong), these functions and mechanisms cannot play their due role. Why? First, the directors of state-owned financial institutions are often appointed by government organizations or superiors. Under such a talent selection mechanism, the main person in charge of a financial institution is not responsible for the financial institution and shareholders he holds, but for the organizational department that appointed him. In this case, the heads of these financial institutions will only bully their superiors, and their actions will only act according to their superiors' preferences, rather than aiming at maximizing the profits of financial institutions. Second, under the above-mentioned personnel system, once the principal responsible person of a financial institution is appointed, he (or several of them) may become the absolute master of this financial institution, not only can he fully grasp the absolute power of this financial institution, but also can legalize this absolute power for him (or several of them) by formulating a system. This kind of abuse of power often appears in a high-sounding "legal" way, which completely legalizes the abuse of power. Although the joint-stock reform of domestic financial institutions is committed to establishing a good corporate governance mechanism, according to the principle of "separation of three meetings, separation of three powers, effective restriction and coordinated development", a modern joint-stock company governance structure is established, which consists of shareholders' meeting, board of directors, board of supervisors and senior management. However, if the personnel system arrangement and power structure of the above-mentioned financial institutions remain unchanged, this corporate governance structure can also become a vassal of absolute power in the above-mentioned financial institutions. If you have this absolute power, any financial crime may be a piece of cake. At the same time, because they can establish many institutional arrangements in financial institutions, the principal responsible persons of these institutions can legalize their financial crimes in various ways to escape the punishment of laws and systems. This is the crux of corruption. Therefore, it is far from enough to start with personal moral level, ideological consciousness, incentive and restraint mechanism, risk control and management, etc., but to start with the source of power to encourage and restrain these criminals, and fundamentally restrain these absolute powers, so as to treat both the symptoms and the root causes, otherwise it will get twice the result with half the effort. Absolute power will lead to absolute corruption. This is how I feel about the Liu Jinbao case.