How to choose a repeat class? Five standard methods of rationality and reliability
At present, repeat classes have sprung up in the society, which is dazzling. Therefore, the best choice can only be made after careful investigation and thinking. On the contrary, it will not only waste money, but also delay time, miss the opportunity of college entrance examination and miss the future of students. So how to make the best choice? Provide five reasonable and reliable standards as follows:
First, see if there is any evidence of students' past achievements.
You can't just look at empty figures, such as the number of people admitted to key universities such as Peking University and Tsinghua, the number of people who passed undergraduate courses, how many points have been improved, and the enrollment rate of dozens of percent. Because of the fierce competition, the numbers reported by some classes are getting more and more fantastic, and it is difficult to distinguish between true and false. Therefore, it depends on whether this repeating class dares to publish a large number of students' real names and previous college entrance examination results in newspapers, websites and publicity materials released to the public. It is not enough to publish only the names and grades of a few candidates (the reason is self-evident). There must be a lot of real-name student scores and the names of admission schools to check. Otherwise, it is not credible or has low credibility.
Second, look at the true quality of teachers.
You can't just look at the general number of special-grade teachers and senior teachers, or the number of teachers in a key school. Or just look at the names of college entrance examination experts and consultants. It depends on whether this repeat class can list the real names, professional titles, photos, schools and so on of teachers who have been teaching all the year round in newspapers, websites and publicity materials released to the society. Because only a few experts are invited to give lectures or "consultants" twice, instead of teaching in the class all the year round, it is of no practical value to repeat students, just a signboard. However, it is not credible to vaguely say that one or more teachers in a key school do not disclose their real names, or even only say Mr. Wang and Mr. Li, or even say their names completely.
Third, look at the true evaluation of previous students.
If a repeat class is really successful, it will inevitably leave written materials written by students admitted by key universities and other institutions such as Tsinghua and Peking University, and these materials dare to be published in newspapers, websites and a large number of publicity materials released to the public (not one or two or three or five people, but dozens or hundreds of people, with the original documents available). Let's see what these students say about this repetition class. Because it is difficult for a large number of students to "sing praises" for a repetition class against their wishes.
There is no real evaluation from a large number of students, which is not credible or has low credibility.
Fourth, look at the teaching qualifications of the organizers.
The organizers of some repeat classes were originally teachers and principals with rich teaching experience and outstanding performance in key middle schools, and of course they have reliable qualifications. Because the repeat students are all students who graduated from high school or are studying in the third year of high school, if the organizers themselves have no experience and qualifications to teach the third year of high school, they will be born with insufficient qualifications. No matter what advanced educational theories or novel educational concepts are preached, no matter what new teaching methods and management methods are preached, it is difficult to make people believe that it is a scientific conclusion summed up from truly reasonable educational practice, and it is also difficult to ensure the high quality of this repeating course. So it is not credible or has low credibility.
Five, to see if there are enough conditions, environment and facilities for running schools independently.
Some repeat classes have their own independent campuses, independent teaching buildings, quiet environment and complete facilities, which is enough.
If you don't have the above conditions, even if you temporarily rent the classroom of Wu Fang Miscellaneous Affairs Office after enrollment, it is not credible or the credibility is very low.
Of course, no matter which repeat class, it is necessary to hold a school-running license issued by the Education Commission and other documents indicating the qualifications for running a school. That is the prerequisite and necessary condition for running a school, so I won't say much here.