First of all, the school is not a law enforcement agency, but the Education Bureau is the law enforcement agency. However, the Education Bureau generally focuses on dealing with illegal acts that violate the education law and will not interfere with traffic violations.
Article 17 of the Administrative Punishment Law stipulates that administrative punishment shall be implemented by administrative organs with the power of administrative punishment within the scope of statutory functions and powers.
Therefore, the school has no right to prohibit parents from driving tricycles to pick up students.
In this incident, the school only conveyed the orders of the superiors, and there was no mandatory requirement, just urging parents not to violate the rules.
Secondly, primary school is compulsory, and schools do not allow students to suspend classes.
Article 2 of the Compulsory Education Law stipulates that the state implements a nine-year compulsory education system. Compulsory education is a compulsory education for all school-age children and adolescents and a public welfare undertaking that the state must guarantee.
Open Netease News to view wonderful pictures.
Therefore, the schools involved cannot suspend classes for students and cannot deprive students of their qualifications because their parents have violated the law.
Of course, the school involved didn't inform the students to suspend classes at all, and I don't know which teacher made a mistake or whether the parents misunderstood.
It is worth noting that if students fight at school, the school can ask parents to take them home for good discipline, and this period is not considered as suspension. After all, it is not enough to educate children by teachers and schools alone. Parents' education is the most important thing.
3. What if parents don't listen and insist on driving a tricycle to pick up students?
Article 19 of the Administrative Punishment Law stipulates that organizations authorized by laws and regulations to manage public affairs may impose administrative penalties within the scope of statutory authorization.
In other words, if the relevant departments want to detain the tricycles of parents who don't listen to advice, there must be laws to follow, otherwise it is abuse of power.
In daily life, there are two common tricycles: freight tricycles and manned tricycles. The freight tricycle can't carry people, and the three-wheeled caravan can carry 3~4 people.
However, these two types of tricycles belong to motor vehicle management, which requires a license plate and a driver's license to get on the road. Not only that, some urban sections also have clear signs prohibiting tricycles from entering.
In other words, whether students can be transported by tricycle depends not only on the style of tricycle, but also on whether there is a certificate of approval and whether there is a no-go rule.
Since the local authorities have issued a notice prohibiting parents from using tricycles to pick up and drop off students in the schools involved, parents can't violate the rules, otherwise the traffic police have the right to detain the vehicles and impose a fine.
Finally, through the video provided by parents to pick up the children at the school gate, we can see that the traffic is very congested and it is difficult for motor vehicles to pass. At this time, if some tricycles appear again, it will easily cause traffic accidents. Therefore, for the safety test of students.