In the process of educating students, many class teachers often fail to grasp the scale of "love" and "strictness" for students. They either love students too much, love them too casually, and lose the dignity of teachers, or tie them too tightly and manage them too hard, so that students can "talk about teachers".

It is a problem that we educators, especially class teachers, should study.

First, loving students is the starting point and foundation of educating students.

Education cannot be without love, just as a pond cannot be without water. Without love, there is no education. Suhomlinski, an educator in the former Soviet Union, regarded teachers' love for students as "the mystery of education"

His motto is "serve the children heart and soul"

Experienced class teachers will have this experience. When students realize that the head teacher really cares about him and loves him, whether you are patient help, serious criticism or even necessary reprimand, students will be willing to accept it. This is the so-called "close to his teacher and believe in his way"

On the contrary, if the head teacher doesn't win the trust of the students, then even if your educational goals are correct and your educational methods are scientific, education can't achieve the expected results. Because in the process of education, students are not only the object of the teacher's role, but also show a "reaction" at any time.

Second, the class teacher is strict with the students.

In educational practice, some

The class teacher's misinterpretation and misuse of "strictness" is thought-provoking. In their place, "severity" has evolved into corporal punishment and corporal punishment in disguise. Although the heart is good and the motive is good, but strictly and unconditionally, love will disappear, and it is no longer the category of "strictness means love", but it will fall into the mud pit of "strictness means harm", and students' self-esteem, personality and self-motivation will be shattered by "strictness" first frost and cold rain. The mind is traumatized and depressed. Over time, it will become a rebellious mentality that regards "teachers" as enemies. This "strictness"

No help, no help, is the implicit strangulation of students' personality development. The real strictness should be: 1, strict but not strict.

It is fair and necessary to be strict with students at any time. Lack of strict requirements and laissez-faire are irresponsible to students. But being strict doesn't mean being strict. Strict means that the head teacher is tough, arbitrary and paranoid. Strictness will make children shrink back in fear. Over time, students' dependence, tension, intention and other bad psychology. Will reproduce. Therefore, the head teacher's attitude towards students should be strict, not strict. 2, strictly qualified "grid" is the scope and scale. The head teacher is strict with the students, but it cannot exceed a certain range and must be strictly measured. There must be an objective reason for the same mistake-students always do well when they don't do their homework, so it's hard to say for ordinary students. The head teacher can't treat such students simply and rudely, but adopt different methods to strictly demand students. This is the case with this different method.