The recommendation on the Internet about Professor Zhai's best-selling monograph Great Wisdom and the Power of Leadership reads: This course makes the essence of Chinese studies serve the present, applies the wisdom of Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism to enterprise practice, and builds entrepreneurs who are saints inside and kings outside ... The course spreads "good knowledge", transmits "positive energy" and shares "great wisdom". The perfect combination of Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism makes people feel that Professor Zhai flows from his bones. What attracts people's attention in the resume is the introduction of Professor Zhai propose to create's "China University Entrepreneurship Training Camp". He personally successfully trained hundreds of thousands of college graduates, and achieved the entrepreneurial dreams of countless talents, even known as "the godfather of entrepreneurial marketing in China".
Strangely, apart from a large number of books and CDs, Professor Zhai's personal experience such as native place, age and education level can't be found on the Internet at all, so this recently hot lecturer in Chinese studies has been cast a mysterious aura. Someone on the Internet jumped out to oppose Professor Zhai Hongshen's title as a master of Chinese studies. A blog titled "Exposing Zhai liar" said: Zhai's real name is Zhai Jinghua, and he is from Jilin. 1997 was chased to Beijing by the police for participating in pyramid schemes, so it was renamed Zhai Hong Shen. ...
Of course, we have no way to verify the source of this anonymous blog information.
It is not difficult to see from the content of Baidu Post Bar that people who have heard Zhai's lecture are divided into two factions. A personal experience of believing in yourself: I don't know whether he was a liar before or whether he will cheat in the future. I only know that I really gained something from listening to his lecture today, such as firm but gentle, team spirit, life style and filial piety. Of course, everything has two sides. Some people think it's good, others think it's bad. Mainly depends on personal understanding. Why not learn what is useful to you and try to dig out those negative things? The other is serious doubt: there are many problems in the in-depth analysis of Zhai's lecture process. Academically, his understanding of the classics of sages is far-fetched. In addition, he often analyzes the specific meaning of a Chinese character and links it with business communication. This analysis lacks scientificity. For example, he said that a group is eloquent, a team is people who listen with their ears, and team building is an eloquent leader who leads others who listen with their ears. It's ok to deepen memory as an example, but it's a bit funny to communicate as a theory.
Many of his remarks are not in line with the spirit of traditional Chinese studies.
There is a lot of controversy:
Filial piety governs the family, middle filial piety governs the enterprise and great filial piety governs the country.
A: This is a complete confusion of concepts, mixing filial piety with loyalty. Filial piety is the most fundamental moral category advocated by Confucianism. Especially the respect for parents and the return of their love. This is a great kinship, which cannot be tampered with, distorted or castrated. The moral attitude towards "enterprise" or "country", that is, the moral attitude towards the country and the collective, is a question of loyalty rather than loyalty, and has nothing to do with filial piety. However, the feudal rulers in ancient China deliberately confused the two categories of "filial piety" and "loyalty" (The Classic of Filial Piety is a typical representative), and played the trick of substituting loyalty for filial piety. They arbitrarily expanded the extension of this concept, but they wanted to use filial piety as a means and loyalty as the purpose. They let their courtiers do their filial duty in order to be loyal to them. The so-called "loyalty comes from the door of a dutiful son."