Fan Meizhong, male, born in Longchang City, Neijiang City, Sichuan Province, 1992, graduated from Longchang No.2 Middle School. 1997 graduated from the history department of Peking University, and worked as a teacher in Shuguang Middle School in Zigong, Sichuan, but later resigned due to class remarks and moved to Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Chongqing, Beijing, Hangzhou, Chengdu and other cities to engage in education or media work. After that, I worked in Guangya School in Dujiangyan City, Sichuan Province. When the Wenchuan earthquake occurred in May 2008, 12, Fan Meizhong, who was giving a lecture in class, ran away in front of the students and resigned from the school. On the 22nd, I published an article on Tianya entitled "The Earth shook at that moment-512 Wenchuan Earthquake Biography", which described in detail what I did during the earthquake and my mental journey afterwards, saying, "At this moment of life and death, I can only consider sacrificing myself for my daughter, and others, even my mother, will not care in this case. Because I can't control my adults, it's one to escape if I can't send it. " It caused an uproar and was ridiculed by netizens as "Fan Paopao", which triggered a discussion about "teachers' morality".
He was an editor in China Economic Times and Southern Sports, and published Fan Meizhong's articles in Tianya Forum and Frontline Education Forum.
Chinese name: Fan Meizhong.
Alias: Fan Paopao
Nationality: People's Republic of China (PRC) (China).
Ethnic group: Han nationality
Place of Birth: Longchang City, Neijiang City, Sichuan Province
Occupation: teacher
Graduate school: Peking University.
Representative works: Pursuit of meaningful education, Beating thoughts with thoughts-Reading Hayek's Biography, etc.
Gender: male
Character experience
Fan Meizhong, who left his students to escape in the Wenchuan earthquake, is currently employed by Beijing Hua Kai Education Company as a lecturer in the lecture hall of humanistic quality of the Institute of Potential Development. The Haidian District Education Bureau in Beijing said that the school has a school license.
In the eye-catching position of Hua Kai Education website, there is an advertisement for "Free Lecture in Hua Kai Education and Humanities Lecture Hall", in which the speaker of "How to improve the liberal arts score and get into Peking University Tsinghua smoothly" is Fan Meizhong, and the speech date is 28th of this month. Next to it is a brief introduction of Fan Meizhong, who graduated from the history department of Peking University and has worked in the field of basic education for a long time. He has unique opinions and research on liberal arts education in middle schools, and is known as "the first liberal arts teacher in China".
"postponed indefinitely"
On the morning of February 28th, 2008, at 65438, the school that signed the letter of appointment with Fan Meizhong issued a statement, and decided to "postpone" Fan Meizhong's teaching appointment indefinitely. The school said that although the decision to hire Fan Meizhong was correct, it did not know enough about the "widespread controversy in Fan Meizhong". Based on this situation, the school decided to "postpone Fan Meizhong's appointment to the school indefinitely".
Character works
Fragile confrontation, extracurricular reading, 2005- 12-05.
Looking for a meaningful education —— Confessions of a Peking University graduate, Basic Education, July 30, 2006.
Walking in nothingness, writing a new world (junior high school edition), 2007-05- 16.
Great and Lonely Soul, Writing New World (Senior High School Edition), 2007-08-0 1.
Fan Paopao prequel, Southern People Weekly, June 2, 20081.
Free choice can bring happiness to teaching, Economic Observer, 20 10- 12-27.
Peking University has brought me unprecedented excitement (excerpt), high school friend, 20 13-09- 16.
Character events
According to the description, when the earthquake happened, he was having a Chinese class at Guangya School in Sichuan. His desk was shaking, but according to some experiences of the earthquake, Fan thought it was a slight earthquake, so he told the students not to panic. But before the words were finished, the teaching building shook violently.
He reacted instantly-a big earthquake! Then suddenly rushed to the stairs. Later, Fan Meizhong found himself the first person to arrive at the football field. It took a long time to see the students coming to the playground one after another. Then he immediately participated in the evacuation of students and did not leave the school.
1 On May 22nd, 2008 at 9: 10, Fan Meizhong, a teacher from Guangya Middle School in Dujiangyan City, Sichuan Province, wrote "The Earth shook at that moment-Personal History of" 512 Wenchuan Earthquake "at Tianya Forum. The article mentioned: "I am a person who pursues freedom and justice, but I am not a person who dares to sacrifice myself after others." At this moment of life and death choice, I can only consider sacrificing myself for my daughter. Other people, even my mother, don't care in this situation. Because I can't control my adults, there is no point in running away from one without moving it. If it is too dangerous, I will die with you. If there is no danger, I don't care about you, and you are not in danger, let alone you are seventeen or eighteen years old! " This remark caused overwhelming criticism and abuse from netizens. At the same time, the "Five Mountains Parting" published an article "Freedom and Morality-From Fan Paopao Event" on its blog, and the word "Fan Paopao" appeared in this way, becoming another name of Fan Meizhong on the Internet.
2. On May 25th, 2008, Fan Meizhong published "Why should I write" The Earth Shakes at that Moment "in Tianya Forum, responding to the posting reasons and netizens' criticism. However, there are still endless articles criticizing Fan on the Internet, such as "Fan Paopao challenges national temperament and causes great moral criticism", "Fan Paopao is actually just a freak among teachers", "Fan Paopao needs to leave without apologizing" and "Fan Paopao needs to leave". "Fan Paopao is a tofu teacher" and "Fan Paopao", aren't you afraid of going to hell? These articles criticized him from various aspects.
3. On May 26th, 2008, Bei 'an published an article on Phoenix Blog: Fan Meizhong: Insulting Teachers and Peking University. The article points out: "Fan Meizhong's shame lies not in running away from the cold feet during the earthquake, but in his' propaganda' of his cowardly behavior after his escape."
On May 27th, 2008, the title "Fan Paopao, who runs faster than Liu Xiang, endorses Nike" appeared in Qihoo Forum. According to the post, Nike believes that Mr. Fan Meizhong, who runs fastest and loves life most in the disaster, is in line with the company's purpose. Therefore, regardless of many China netizens' doubts about Mr. Fan Meizhong, Nike decided to invite this fastest teacher, nicknamed "Fan Paopao" by China netizens, as the image spokesperson of Nike running shoes. Unexpectedly, some netizens immediately forwarded the post to Tianya, Maopu, Netease, Sina and other forums, and concealed the words "B.T. News Agency reporter Xia Chedan". Because the original text was presented in the form of news, many netizens believed it and denounced Nike. Some netizens even said, "What's your intention?" ? Big American companies asked Fan Paopao to endorse Nike running shoes, comparing Nike with Carrefour, which was boycotted not long ago, and calling on netizens to boycott Nike products. This appeal was quickly answered. The news of the boycott spread rapidly through QQ groups and classmates' records. In the QQ group news received by the reporter, some netizens called for a protest in the local Nike store, and the QQ group news was accompanied by specific protest time and plan.
5. On June 2, 2008, Zhang Ruoyu commented on Xinhuanet: "Fan Meizhong in the Eyes of an Ordinary Teacher", confessing as a confessor: "As a monument of Fan Meizhong Xerox, how much courage, will and blessing should I have? I know clearly and painfully that the distance between me and Fan Meizhong seems far away, but in fact it is so close, probably just separated by an earthquake. I asked myself, what would I do if I were in Fan Meizhong's position? Will I fly away like him, or will I live and die with my students? This question has been asked in my mind countless times, but I still can't give myself a clear answer, so that now I have refused to recall and answer this question. My fear is as strong and as small as my courage. "
On June 2, 2008, People's Daily Online commented, "Fan Meizhong has given China people a difficult problem: Can I not be a hero?" Fan Meizhong's honesty embarrassed us. We should not only praise its honesty, but also condemn its impact on the traditional virtue of "striving to be a hero". What should I do? Is it necessary to condemn Fan Meizhong's honesty in order to maintain the dignity of traditional virtues? That won't do either! Because honesty is also a traditional virtue of China people.
On June 6th, 2008, Guo Songmin, an online critic, published a blog post "Fan Paopao should be a mirror of China elite". This article first lists the sinking of the famous Titanic. Pointed out: "In this incident, the captain, several crew members and male passengers all sank to the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean with this luxury cruise ship. Most people living in the ice sea are women and children, and they have the least ability to escape. " The article points out: "For the elite, the biggest tragedy is not to die in an earthquake or shipwreck, but to be spurned by the public!" "In fact, elites should seriously think about it. Do they think too much about themselves and too little about the public at every critical moment, like Fan Paopao? Did you use your dominant position to grab too many interests that belonged to the public? " Since then, many articles have begun to criticize Fan Meizhong's behavior with Titanic as an example.
8. On June 6, 2008, Wang Haiming, a professor of philosophy at Peking University, said in an exclusive interview with China Youth Daily: "Other teachers did not escape in the earthquake, which shows that this is the basic morality, and Fan Meizhong's behavior has crossed the moral bottom line." Strictly speaking, ethics and law can be transformed into each other. Professor Wang also believes that in this earthquake, everyone must make voluntary donations. Many people regard donation as charity, not as responsibility and obligation. They don't know that under special circumstances, at an extraordinary moment, contributing to the country is a responsibility, not just a good thing. Not donating is not fulfilling responsibilities and obligations. (Fan Meizhong) is honest and shameless, then you are hopeless. "
9. On June 7th, 2008, Phoenix TV Chinese Channel "One Tiger, One Talk" broadcast a special program "Is it dereliction of duty for Fan Meizhong to run away regardless of students?". After the program was broadcast, the Fan Meizhong incident took a major turn. At the same time, Guo Songmin, an online "critic" who opposed Fan Meizhong in the program, accused Fan Dajia, who was accused by netizens as "Guo Tiao" and "hypocrite", and the number of people who supported Fan Meizhong began to rise sharply. The headmaster of Guangya Middle School in Dujiangyan, where Fan is located, said by telephone: "I love his career and students, and he will not fire anyone who is convicted of his remarks." Fan Meizhong made a limited apology to the principal and students in the program, but said, "This doesn't mean that I apologize for my opinion. I still stick to my point of view. "
On June 7th, 2008, in Tencent.com, Fan Meizhong had a dialogue and interview with Professor Zhou Xiaozheng, a famous sociologist. In the program, Fan Meizhong once again explained the reasons behind his remarks, and said that he would not accept corresponding programs and interviews in the future.
11.On June 9, 2008, Southern Metropolis Daily published a review article "The idea of freedom is inviolable-my views on Fan Meizhong's running". The article holds that Fan Meizhong's claim that "it is absurd to run out from the perspective of interest balance" is because, first, in that case, if Fan Meizhong, as a teacher, can stick to his post and organize students in an orderly way, and second, even if only one student escaped because of Fan Meizhong's stick to his post, the model man died, but because this student is much younger than him, just from the length of his life, this student is very happy to survive. At the same time, because our behavior will destroy people's traditional moral concepts and make future generations unhappy, Fan is "denying the virtue and nobility under the banner of freedom with the concept of freedom, which is not only a serious misunderstanding of freedom, but also a blasphemy against freedom!"
On June 12 and June 12, 2008, a netizen published "Being Worthy of Peking University", which recorded his mental process of changing his understanding and pointed out: "A traditional moral concept formed in our society for a long time is impeccable on the surface, reasonable and reasonable, but there are great loopholes in the middle." This article has caused widespread controversy in Peking University. Someone pointed out: 1. Peking University has always taken the pursuit of truth as its responsibility. The truth is not clear to everyone, and it will never yield to the so-called "public opinion" and saliva. 2. Peking University has always taken it as his duty to reflect on society, while Fan Meizhong has caused great social reflection on moral issues in his own way.
On June 13 and June 12, 2008, Phoenix.com commented that the meanness of teacher Fan Meizhong is the passport of the meanest person, pointing out: "We were touched by teachers like Tan Qianqiu and Qu Wanrong, because they told us with actions that' teachers' morality is like a mountain'". Teacher Fan hates the current education system and hopes to bring some new ideas to basic education. We welcome this with both hands, but we don't want to see you run away in the face of disaster. A person's thought is active and avant-garde, but if he doesn't even have a little teacher's morality or even a little human touch, he can only be a hypocritical thinker. "
On June 14 and June 12, 2008, Lu Tianming, a famous anti-corruption writer, published a blog comment "At this moment, Fan Meizhong must be nailed to the historical shame column". The article pointed out: "The disaster relief work in the earthquake zone is still at a critical moment, and many lives are still buried in the ruins. There can only be one voice at this time, and that is to rush to save people! All words and deeds that hinder saving lives must be regarded as "anti-human" behavior. If in wartime, you can shoot on the spot. Finally, the author said: At this critical moment, such a despicable "Fan Meizhong" must be nailed to the shame column of history to set the record straight!
15, June 2008 14, from Xiaobo's comment on Xinhuanet: "Watching Fan Paopao and Hot Dance Covered by Media", the article thinks that "Fan Paopao" can sit in the studio of Phoenix TV and talk in Kan Kan, Kan Kan, which will confuse the audience with right and wrong. If it is anti-human and immoral, it will be favored by the media. I wonder how many people will follow in the footsteps of Sister Furong and Fan Paopao. "
On June 6th and June 4th, 2008, Phoenix blogger Zhu Guangbing recorded a telephone interview with Guangya School in the evening. The interview record shows: "The education department has officially informed us to cancel Teacher Fan's teacher qualification. Mr. Fan has no teacher qualification, just as the driver has no driver's license, we can't hire him any more. " The teachers in the school also said: "Most teachers think that his speech is inappropriate and unworthy to be a teacher; Among the students, some say he is good, others say he is bad. However, the parents of the students reacted strongly and said that they don't want people like our school who "don't even care about their mothers" to teach their children. " Fan Meizhong, on the other hand, said that he thought the practice of the Ministry of Education was unreasonable: if he said that he didn't save the students and ran away first, he was not worthy to be a teacher, then he felt that he had violated the Teachers Law. "Is there a rule that teachers should risk their lives or even sacrifice their own lives to save students?" ? If he can't be a teacher because the first paragraph in "At that moment, the earth shakes" shows that he is unpatriotic, he thinks it is also nonsense. "I can't say I'm unpatriotic just because I criticize the country; And I can't cancel my teacher qualification on the grounds of unpatriotic. " Fan Meizhong said that there are too many citizens in China who do not resist the abuse of power by the administrative department, but he is different. He will defend his rights and dignity at all costs. "The point is not whether I can win this lawsuit. Even if I lose my job, I will defend my rights and freedom of speech. "
17, June, 2008 15, the Republic held a symposium for scholars and experts, attended by Guo,, and others. At the meeting, some experts thought: "Fan Meizhong wants to defeat the whole mainstream morality! Trying to pry open the morality of the whole human race! Very shameless! " ; At the same time, "Phoenix TV is a dung scraper". What is even more shameful is to discuss topics that don't need to be discussed in a big way and confuse the values that were originally clear! " "People who support Fan Meizhong are particularly shameless!" "The success of our present education is the result of our collectivism, socialism and heroism education in China!" Utopia also specially opened a column criticizing Fan Paopao, which made a deeper analysis and criticism of "liberalism represented by Fan".
18, June, 2008 15, the Beijing News published Wu Jiaxiang's comment: "Fan Paopao blasphemes" freedom ",which pointed out:" Teacher Fan and his students are not ordinary passengers on a wooden boat, but legal subjects with rights and responsibilities: Teacher Fan exercises guardianship over students on behalf of the school and has guardianship responsibilities at the same time; Students are entrusted by their parents to the school and enjoy custody. In the event of a life-threatening catastrophic event, the guardian has the responsibility to risk his own life to help the ward. In this case, the responsibility of rescue is no different from that of soldiers on the battlefield. " "Freedom and responsibility are symmetrical. Freedom without responsibility can only be the freedom of animals (hunting) or mice (escaping), not the freedom of people. "
On June 9th and June 6th, 2008, Fang Fang, a critic who is famous for his opposition to pseudoscience, published the article "I will definitely be expelled from school in the United States", pointing out that "reasonable efforts must be made to protect students from situations harmful to study, health and safety" stipulated in the Code of Ethics for Education Industry formulated by the National Education Association of the United States. If this happened in the United States, Fan Meizhong would definitely be expelled from school, and he would never want to be a teacher again in his life. The reason is simple: his approach is very unprofessional.
On June 6, 2008 16, Wang Xuming, a spokesperson for the Ministry of Education, said in an interview that the expulsion of Fan Meizhong, the "first place", was decided by his school, not an official instruction of the Ministry of Education. Wang Xuming said that the Ministry of Education has not issued any notice to cancel Fan Meizhong's teacher qualification. However, according to his current understanding, the school in Fan Meizhong has indeed issued a formal written notice to dismiss him. Guangya School, which teaches in Fan Meizhong, is a private school. According to the relevant provisions of People's Republic of China (PRC) Private Education Promotion Law, the school has the right to dismiss Fan Meizhong. On the same day, He Bing, deputy dean of the Law School of China University of Political Science and Law, said in an interview with Youth Weekend: "This is a case worthy of in-depth study. If Fan Meizhong wants to appeal, we will provide legal aid. "
2 1, June 17, 2008, Qing Guangya, the headmaster of Dujiangyan Guangya Middle School, said in a telephone interview with Xin Kuai that Dujiangyan Education Bureau found him again on the morning of June 16 and conducted an interview for more than an hour. "The leader of the Education Bureau told him that because Fan Meizhong made inappropriate remarks, the impact was too great, and now he verbally asked the school to dismiss Fan Meizhong." Zhou Zebang, secretary of the Disciplinary Committee of Dujiangyan Education Bureau, said: "It is their school-running behavior for private schools to dismiss and hire teachers." When asked by the reporter whether the Education Bureau requested to expel Fan Meizhong, Zhou Zebang said, "We exercise the right of education management according to our functions". Jasmine Zhang, director of Dujiangyan Education Bureau, told the reporter on the same day that according to the relevant management regulations, if Dujiangyan Education Bureau issues a certificate, it will be handled in accordance with the Teachers Law and other relevant laws. However, according to their investigation, Fan Meizhong did not apply for certification from the bureau. The bureau has instructed Guangya School to provide relevant certificates of Fan Meizhong, but no reply has been received so far.
22. On June 7, 2008, the Yangzi Evening News published a commentary entitled "Fan Meizhong's rice bowl is suspected of abusing his power". The article holds that even if Fan Meizhong's words and deeds violate the Teachers Law and other relevant laws and regulations, his punishment must be strictly carried out in accordance with legal procedures. It is the sorrow of a society ruled by law to punish another illegal act by one illegal means. At the same time, the article quoted Professor He Bing from China University of Political Science and Law as saying in his blog that "disqualification belongs to one of the administrative penalties stipulated in China's Administrative Punishment Law". According to relevant regulations, "when dealing with the Fan Meizhong incident, relevant departments should at least perform the following procedures: First, conduct fact-finding and form evidence. Two, before the punishment, the implementation of the hearing; Three, the production of formal punishment documents, inform the punishment facts and legal basis, and served on the relevant responsible person Fan Meizhong. 4. In the punishment document, Fan Meizhong should be informed of the right to file administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation. " Obviously, in terms of procedure, the relevant departments are seriously illegal.
23. On June 7th, 2008, China Youth Daily published Ye Zhijun's comment, "Can Fan Meizhong be dismissed from school?" The article holds that dismissing a Fan Meizhong can clear up the teaching style and set things right, but there is some optimism close to vanity. As the former high flyers of Peking University, if it really breeds ideas that are not allowed by mainstream values, can it be solved by expelling several teachers?
On June 8, 2008, Guangzhou Daily published Wang Wenqi's commentary "Social Tolerance is Better for Saving Fan Meizhong", arguing that Fan Meizhong is still a growing young man. Although he is over 40 years old, he has not yet formed a complete and sound value system. Although he is knowledgeable, he doesn't know the meaning of knowledge and talent to people. Although he clamored for freedom, he understood freedom in isolation, did not understand its true connotation, and could not tear the relationship between freedom and responsibility, rights and obligations. "If there are other values besides the Fan Meizhong incident itself, this test of social tolerance should be one of them."
On June 8, 2008, Wang, secretary of the Party Committee of Peking University History Department, said in an interview with Information Times: "We are ashamed to have such students! We agree to expel him from school! " At the same time, Wang Shuji said: "After leaving school, Fan Meizhong once called the teacher he met at Peking University in turn on the Internet. He doesn't study hard at school and is very disrespectful to the teacher! "
On June 9, 2008, Oriental Daily published Cao Lin's commentary "Don't underestimate the value of Fan Meizhong". The article holds that Fan Meizhong has exposed his true thoughts and the dark side of human nature, which is an opportunity for us to reflect on human nature, morality and self-improvement. But it is such an excellent reflection resource, but it is regarded as a moral criticism movement to build chastity archways by pseudo-Taoists and network cynics. At the same time, he also published the article "I feel that President Guangya is going to scold the people who built the collapsed building", suggesting that when the house collapsed, the teacher let the students escape alone, which may not be the result of careful consideration, but an instinctive survival response of people when danger comes-this instinct is immoral, but it can be forgiven, because everyone may have this instinct, but they just did not fulfill their moral obligation to help others and did not harm their own interests. However, it is unforgivable to cut corners when building a house, replace steel bars with iron wires, and mix sand with cement. That's not an instinct to survive, but to kill for one's own interests and put others' lives in danger for one's own interests. In contrast, of course, those who should be scolded most are those who repair buildings and collapse them.
27. On June 20th, 2008, Lu Guoping commented: "Fan Meizhong, the first teacher, was dismissed, which has nothing to do with legal procedures, but was convicted for his words!" Although we now pay attention to governing the country according to law, this does not mean that loopholes in the system and legal system can be used as a reason for Fan Meizhong to escape punishment. In China, when encountering problems, we usually seek countermeasures, which is the so-called piecemeal administrative model. "Therefore," Fan Meizhong has become a typical villain because of the media hype and national debate, and it is of far-reaching significance to appropriately punish his social influence! "
On June 20, 2008, Cao Lin, editor-in-chief of China Youth Daily, published a commentary entitled "Peking University is ashamed of Fan Paopao's loss of university spirit", arguing that Peking University can express its moral stance and criticize its students in the escape incident, but on the issue of "expulsion", it should stick to the values of freedom of thought and speech, firmly stand on the side of its students as their alma mater and firmly stand on the side of the bastion of freedom.
On June 20, 2008, Qian Wenzhong, a professor of history at Fudan University, pointed out in Zhenjiang: "There is no second teacher except him (Fan Meizhong)!" Professor Qian finally pointed out that "running" is "no excuse" because everyone should have a sense of shame. "Fan Paopao" not only ran away, but also "defended" in front of such multimedia. The most terrible thing is "defending with the knowledge of Peking University!"
On June 2, 2008, the Beijing News published Linda's article "Should Fan Meizhong be Fired?" Taking Mr. Churchill in the 9 1 1 incident in the United States as an example, this paper points out that although his remarks touched the public anger in the United States, his school "still supports his due rights because he must adhere to the principle of academic freedom without interference", and the article points out that "having good ideological and moral character" in the education law is a necessary condition for teachers' qualifications. As a legal provision, its definition is not clear. What is a good idea? Who will judge and define? Legal provisions that may be interpreted at will are the focus of attention. "
On June 2 1 and June 2 1 2008, China Youth Daily published an article entitled "No one has the obligation to exchange his life for his life" by Ma Shaohua, a professor at China Renmin University. The article points out: "I don't think teachers have the obligation to sacrifice their lives to save students' lives. If Guo asked Fan to make such a sacrifice, it should not be. "The" Teacher Law "has been revised again, and it cannot be written that teachers have to sacrifice their lives to protect students. We can only emphasize the obligation of teachers to protect students more clearly. "
On June 25th, 2008, Guangzhou Daily published a comment by psychologist Zhang: "We are too tolerant of' inappropriate remarks'. This article is based on the American "James? Watson incident and Larry, former president of Harvard University? The Summers incident pointed out that the United States is also a country that keeps its word. Finally, the article points out: "Curing his' sin' is objectively equivalent to encouraging all teachers to learn from him."
33. On June 25th, 2008, Southern People Weekly published The Moral Experiment of Heresy. The article lists all kinds of comments since the Fan incident and thinks that Fan has become the target of public criticism. Zhan Jiang, dean of the School of Journalism and Communication at China Youth University for Politics, was quoted as saying, "Fan Meizhong tested China's current moral concept, and we found that it was actually a' saint'."
On June 25th, 2008, the spokesman of the Ministry of Education expressed his views on the Fan Meizhong incident in an interview with china economic herald, saying: "We can be immoral, but we can't be shameless". In the afternoon, Fan Meizhong declared that he was not noble and didn't want to be noble, but he didn't think he was shameless. Instead, Fan Meizhong reminded the Ministry of Education to pay attention to the collapsed school buildings. "The officials and education officials who built these schools are the most shameless." .
35. On June 26th, 2008, the Ministry of Education published the newly revised Code of Professional Ethics for Primary and Secondary School Teachers (Draft for Comment) on its official website, in which "protecting students' safety" was added for the first time, and a big discussion on the implementation details of the Teachers Law and the Teachers' Ethics Ordinance was launched on the Internet. Public opinion generally believes that this is a dedication of Fan. However, Jingchu.com published "How Can the Ministry of Education Blame the Protection of Students' Safety?" The article pointed out that teachers' protection of students' safety is at the end of this chain and plays the most limited role compared with the renovation of dangerous houses and students' safety awareness. At this time, the Ministry of Education should use the prestige of public opinion and work with relevant departments to solve various deep-seated problems that threaten the safety of teachers and students, and come up with specific measures, guidelines and timetables to make the chain of student protection firm and safe.
On June 29th, 2008, Southern People Weekly interviewed Qing Guangya, the headmaster of Guangya Middle School. He analyzed that Teacher Fan's "running first" on the Internet was a "morbid reaction" after the earthquake, which was close to "dreaming". In the interview, he revealed how Fan Meizhong entered Guangya Middle School and his performance in the school. He also stressed: "The school is 20 kilometers away from the earthquake center15-. At that time, the house fanned like a piece of paper. In that short period of time, people's brains were blank. In the memory of many of our teachers, half an hour is spent thinking about their mothers, children and hometown. " At the same time, he also believes: "Fan Meizhong may be telling the truth, but it is not beautiful." .
37. On February 30th, 2008, at 65438, Fan Meizhong accepted an interview with Tianya Zatan and answered many questions that netizens were concerned about.
On May 27th, 2065438+00, on the occasion of the second anniversary of "Fan Meizhong Storm" and "Outline of the National Medium-and Long-Term Education Reform and Development Plan", commentator Diao Bo published an article entitled "If we want to reform education, we must re-recognize Fan Meizhong" in Guangming.com ... The article holds that Fan Meizhong is a truly outstanding teacher and a well-deserved victim of an educational environment where right and wrong are reversed and black and white are unclear. Today, 20 years later, we can't realize that we were wrong about Fan Meizhong. Call on the society to re-understand Fan Meizhong and seriously reflect on education.
Personality assessment
On February 23rd, 2008, at 65438, Zhang Wenbin, a spokesman for Hua Kai Education, said that there was a great response after the news came out, and the Central University for Nationalities officially informed Hua Kai Education to cancel the lecture.
Ran Dong, head of education in Hua Kai, said that through many contacts and past facts, Fan Meizhong's teaching level is worthy of recognition, and its behavior is a question of evaluation. Ran Dong believes that as an educator, we should treat people comprehensively. I believe that Fan Meizhong is fully qualified to be a lecturer in the lecture hall of humanistic quality in the School of Potential Development of this school, and students in Hua Kai will benefit a lot. It is reported that Fan Meizhong's employment period is two years.
Fan Meizhong said on the 23rd that the most important reason why he accepted to work in Beijing was the economy. "I have to accept a job. I need a life." . He said he didn't want to talk about the problems before and after the earthquake.