Actually, it's all the same It is necessary to separate politics from military affairs. Only when there is a major casualty accident will the responsibility be investigated. At ordinary times, you treat the instructor as the company commander, and the company commander is the same as the instructor. But in the eyes of soldiers, it seems that leaders have greater prestige, but in the eyes of cadres, they are the same, and they are all responsible for the double heads.
The company commander is responsible for military training, the deputy company commander is responsible for logistics, and the company commander is responsible when the company commander is not on duty. The instructor is responsible for political study, and the assistant instructor is not on duty. The platoon leader is responsible for the training and life of the three classes in this platoon, and the steward is mainly responsible for the specific work and food arrangement of the logistics and catering classes.
The company commander has more power. After all, when assigning tasks to regiments and divisions, the company commander should call the roll first, and the training results are good or bad. The company commander has a greater responsibility. The company commander scolded the soldiers, the instructor coaxed the soldiers, led the team, the instructor followed the team, the company commander nominated, the instructor named, the company commander domesticated, and the instructor analyzed the correctness of the company commander's domestication. The company commander said that the soldier could be a monitor, and the instructor said that he could.
Anyone who has served as a company commander instructor or is performing tasks in an army company knows that the company commander instructor is the military and political head of the company at the same level, and there is no question of who has power. Only those who are in charge of the company's military and political work are responsible for each other according to the division of responsibilities. Practice has proved that no matter in the past or now, company commanders and instructors struggle for power and interests and care about individual rights, and the company's construction can never be done well.
The company commander is like a literary pro, and the instructor is like a mother. Parents beat their children and need their mothers to coax them. Some fathers are strong and overbearing, and mothers are weak. On the contrary, some mothers are so strong that their fathers dare not fart. The power of company commander and instructor depends on personal ability and personality charm, and who has higher prestige.
Generally speaking, the company commander has great power. The company commander is responsible for training and assigning tasks, while the instructor is responsible for logistics and arranging learning. The company commander's decision cannot be changed. In the army, the task is the main task, the company commander performs the task in the regiment, and the instructor assists the company commander in implementing the arrangement and supplement.
A company commander can't shake his subordinate officers and men and won't put you in this position. Think about what the company commander said in the battlefield. The instructor's ideological work is obviously out of touch with the company commander, delaying the fighter plane and mutiny. His wrong behavior can be rejected by reporting or by the resolution of the Party branch. Since the adaptation of Sanwan, establishing a branch in the company has always been a magic weapon for our army to defeat the enemy.
Simply put: it is a level. There are political commissars at or above the regiment level, instructors at the battalion level and instructors at the platoon level, all of which guide the political work of the army on behalf of party organizations. Therefore, instructors are as powerful as company commanders, and they are all ministerial-level cadres as provincial party committee secretaries and governors.
A company depends on whether it is an infantry company or an artillery company, as well as a reconnaissance company. In fact, many companies are more than three platoons, usually equipped with a command platoon and company personnel. There are four platoons in total, and there are more than three command platoons, namely reconnaissance class, wired class and wireless class. There may be no cable class now, it's called communication class! Therefore, a company is definitely more than 100 people, and a full-fledged field force's company level is at least 120 people!
This configuration should be adjusted. If there is a war, the company commander has little power and it is difficult to command. Instructors can't fight. They are all civilian cadres, and their power is sometimes greater than that of the company commander. Sometimes, the company commander's wisdom and talent can only be decided with the consent of the instructor. For the company commander, he wears a tight spell on military talents and does not command interests. In the army, even the adult part is party member, so the company commander and instructor should shoulder this burden.
It stands to reason that they are big or small, equal in rank and different in power. But according to the ranking order of China, the company commander should have more power in theory. For example, troops participate in various activities. Under normal circumstances, the ranks of captains, heads and company commanders are all in front of political commissars or instructors. Why are they in the front row?
I believe everyone knows that people at the official level or with greater power in our country will be ahead. For example, provincial leaders attend activities, and the provincial party secretary ranks before the governor, so the provincial party secretary has more power. The army is a little special, so the military chief has a little more power than the political chief, otherwise no one will make the final decision once the war is divided.
The company commander and the instructor are both chief officials, with equal positions, but the instructor is the secretary and the company commander is the deputy secretary. Generally, whoever is the secretary is the monitor. And the company commander is a secretary. So who has great power, the superior clearly has a secretary, outsiders don't know, and even many soldiers don't know, but a group of people in the branch know. In the battle, of course, the company commander ordered the whole company to rush forward, and of course the instructors must obey the orders. In battle, the company commander has the right to decide.
But once the company commander is afraid to rush forward, the instructor has the right to order the company commander to rush forward. In an emergency, the instructor can exercise the power of the secretary and deprive the company commander of the command, because politically, the instructor has the right to decide. In a word, the position of company commander and instructor is the same, regardless of priority. The focus of the work is just different.