What is quality education?

Quality education is essentially an education aimed at improving the quality of the whole nation. Quality-oriented education is an education aimed at achieving the goals stipulated in the educational policy, focusing on the requirements of the educated group and the long-term development of society, facing all students, improving students' basic quality in an all-round way, paying attention to developing the potential of the educated and promoting their lively development in moral, intellectual and physical aspects.

Defect: posting a paper to you may be helpful ~ ~

Personally, it will also lead to unfair education, because after all, the implementation of quality education in western or rural areas will be weaker than that in developed areas ~

That piece of paper is ``.

I applaud China's exam-oriented education.

Writing this title, I think, will certainly attract criticism and criticism, but as an engineer of human soul and a teacher who has been educated by the party for many years, my responsibility and conscience urge me to write a true story.

In recent years, China's exam-oriented education has been severely criticized by people of insight from all walks of life, especially after Niu Peihang, a small inventor in Shanxi, recently, the voice of completely denying exam-oriented education is even louder. It seems that Niu Peihang's case has become a typical textbook to criticize China's exam-oriented education, and there are even articles on the Internet calling for the cancellation of the college entrance examination. However, I don't think so. China's exam-oriented education has its defects, but it can't be completely denied. Since China resumed the college entrance examination system. Without exam-oriented education, there would be no outstanding talents of all kinds for so many years. Nor can it support the rapid economic and technological development of our motherland in recent years. What kind of education a country wants to develop, it must know what its national conditions are. With different national conditions, different cultural backgrounds and different cultural atmosphere, we naturally adopt different educational models, and exam-oriented education is the most fair and just. Under the current national conditions in China, without fairness and justice, quality education will surely become a hotbed of educational corruption. Because there is no fixed model and standard for quality education, there are a lot of human factors. And quality education is generally around the children in the city. If exam-oriented education is abolished, it is almost impossible for those rural children, especially those in remote areas, to enter universities.

Everyone knows that there is a "National Youth Science and Technology Innovation Competition" in China, which is the highest level of quality education. I have been a tutor of several students' innovative inventions myself, and I know the inside story. Because the first and second prizes of the Youth Science and Technology Innovation Competition can be sent to universities, and the policies of different provinces are different, even if they win provincial prizes, there are various concessions. The fierceness of "competition" is beyond the imagination of laymen. Of course, the "competition" I'm talking about here is not students and students. For those students who have no hope of college entrance examination, they can go to famous universities if they win, but the organizing committee of the competition gives each province a few places to participate in the national competition every year, seven or eight provinces, more than a dozen provinces, and some are divided into primary schools, junior high schools and senior high schools. In the end, only a few can really participate in each grade. But when judging in schools or districts, there are generally no judges, as long as almost all the works can be sent to cities or regions to participate in the competition, even cities and provinces. The "competition" to curry favor with and find the back door will follow. After the "competition" is completed, the judges of ordinary cities sometimes serve as judges of their own province. Even if they don't know each other, each judge has his own object to take care of. Several judges take care of each other, from appraisal to appraisal. In fact, it is basically the default, so the annual competition has become a good opportunity for the municipal and provincial judges to generate income, as well as those tutoring. For their future common interests, they simply ignore the dark forces in the hearts of participating students and players. In the minds of many students, the purpose of participating in the competition is to get extra points for further study. In the minds of those tutors, the students they tutor participate in the competition in order to get the ranking, just for the school to get a sum of money from the Association for Science and Technology every year or to keep the science and technology demonstration school, and some parents can get more bonuses themselves. Regardless of the influence on children in the future, take your own inventions or others' inventions as students' works to participate in the competition. There are also some collective projects, and what's more, parents and judges jointly staged a double spring. Either parents choose a topic and hang the names of several children, or one person invents it, and another person pastes the name, and the person who takes the name is responsible for spending money to run the relationship. However, students rarely make their own works, and most of them are made by parents or schools at the expense of factories. I tutored a student named Wang Haohui, whose parents were off work. Because he rides an old bike to school every day, his tires are often broken. Once when he was mending a tire, he saw a spring beside him, so he thought of putting the spring directly into the bicycle belt, not afraid that the belt would be punctured or leaked. After talking to me, I asked him to make a sample to prepare for the competition, but because his family was poor, he found an old bike and took it out, and wound a long one with scrap wire himself. I was eliminated as soon as I entered the city. The reason is that their works cannot stand the test of practice. Isn't it enough to explain the principle of children's works? Practical, it becomes a product. Then they might as well open a factory. Later, the student was admitted to the university by his own efforts.

In the 20th Youth Science and Technology Competition, there was a work called Three-Use Grenade in Xuzhou, Jiangsu. A senior two student has no teacher and no experimental equipment. How could he possibly develop high-risk explosive military articles? People are naturally suspicious, so their parents made a special trip to Nanjing to try to settle Cheng Weimin, a key figure in the organizing Committee of the competition, which led to an open and evil counterfeiting activity in the competition. Until now, Judge Cheng Weimin, known as the "black whistle", is still being prosecuted. At the 19 National Youth Science and Technology Innovation Competition, Chen XX, a second-grade pupil of Guangxi Team, and his fourth-grade classmate Mo XX invented a set of high-tech "road automatic management system" and produced such high-tech works together with junior students. The sharp contrast attracted a lot of attention. Faced with such high-tech works, visitors are amazed. I asked a few simple questions on purpose. No matter how anxious the tutor reminded them there, the two children either agreed or could not explain the invention, and bowed their heads and said nothing. At that time, it became the focus of discussion among teams, which was a typical behind-the-scenes work rather than parents. At the 2nd1National Competition held in Macau, a paper entitled "Exploration of Ancient Traffic in the Middle Reaches of the Yellow River-Regional Investigation and Protection Assumption with Historical Relics of Shanxi Province as the Main Body of the Yellow River" won the first prize, but three girls from three different schools usually don't know each other. Just then, they came to inspect the Yellow River in January. Can you believe it? If it's not body double's works by parents, what can it be? Even Professor Xian Weiguang of the University of Macau, the judge of the contest, is very skeptical, especially about some difficult topics, such as nanotechnology, cloning and gene transformation. The research methods and means are beyond the knowledge that ordinary middle school students can learn at school, but how much is done by the contestants themselves?

It can be said that in all group events, it is 100% false that students of one school, one grade and one gender do not participate in the competition. All personal works should be mostly works after an epiphany. Without children's inspiration, they can basically be behind the scenes.

However, what about some really high-level good inventions? At the 2006 International Innovation Exhibition for Middle School Students held in Copenhagen, Denmark, the young inventor Pan Liqun won the International Innovation Award for Middle School Students. His work is an invention that can solve the problem of distinguishing traffic lights when people with color vision impairment are driving. He was awarded the highest prize "Best International Excellent Project Award" and was the only China player to win this honor in this innovation exhibition. However, he didn't win the first and second prizes in the National Youth Science and Technology Innovation Competition, so he was rejected by the university. (Although I was admitted to Shandong University later) As for Niu Peixing mentioned in the article, when I was watching TV, I thought, since Niu Peixing is so excellent, why haven't I heard of it in the National Youth Science and Technology Innovation Competition? I looked it up online, and it's really amazing. Niu Peixing has three works selected for the provincial competition, but none of them has participated in the national competition. His shoe piano patent was bought by Americans, and was selected by CCTV Channel 4 Global 360 to play for Chinese people all over the world, because I know; The inventions of senior engineers in major enterprises are all dreams of being selected for Channel 4. It's not easy for a child, but for this invention, it only won the third prize at the provincial level, while the patented siphon bought by another American could not be found by searching the report and list. The water-saving invention reported on TV that attracted tens of millions of investments only won a second prize, while another invention of physical battery by Niu Peihang, although Liu Dongfang, another small inventor who was reported by many media, invented a paper on "Blind Road Perception", which was published in the excellent journal Urban Roads and Bridges and Flood Control of China Ministry of Construction in 2005. The editorial department also issued an "editorial" to give high praise to the paper and highly praised Liu Dongfang's lofty spirit of donating his research results of "Perception of the Road for the Blind" to the China Disabled Persons' Federation for free, but his invention was only obtained.

In recent years, under the influence of so-called quality education, schools have taken a fancy to students' various innovative inventions, so various invention award certificates have become new favorites, and various innovation competitions have gradually increased. But please make a careful investigation to see if any ordinary students, organizers or children related to the organizers have won those higher prizes in this kind of competition in the province or city. The above examples are just competitions. Can we really recruit talents by enrolling students with so-called qualities instead of exams? Then who knows what will happen? This is a series of consequences caused by quality education in China.

However, not only that, quality education may not really be implemented in rural areas, because the cost of quality education is much higher than that of exam-oriented education, and those teenagers who have achieved success have one thing in common; They are all city residents. Take Jing M.Guo and Han Han as examples. They can afford a lot of extracurricular books, and they can also go to bookstores and libraries. Niu Peihang's airplane models and various tools must cost a lot of money, and there are places to sell them. This is not something a rural child can enjoy.

The moral standard of our social behavior is fairness and justice. No matter how attractive the result of quality education is, it should not exceed this principle. It is only fair and just to put students on a starting line and measure the merits of each student by means of exams. I dare say that if our country implements the so-called quality education and cancels the college entrance examination, then 80% of rural college students and poor students at school will not be able to enter the university campus, which will cause social contradictions.