As we all know, it is difficult for college students to find jobs, while female college students have a higher employment threshold and encounter more employment discrimination. According to a survey, about 70% of female college students believe that there is inequality between men and women in job hunting. Many companies are even more blunt: "Hiring male employees not only saves a lot of trouble, but also saves costs and avoids' gender loss'." Faced with heavy employment discrimination, many female college students are helpless. Some girls try to increase their employment chips by shaping their external image and improving their internal quality. At least in the interview, the employer can see an image of dignified behavior and extraordinary temperament, improve their impression, and hope to reduce employment discrimination against women.

But what is worth pondering is that from the external plastic image and internal quality, not only girls need it, but also boys need it. Only asking girls to be "ladies" is itself a kind of gender discrimination. In addition, the threshold set by "Ladies Class" is very high. Only those whose height, temperament and potential meet the requirements are eligible for admission, and those whose height and appearance are not up to standard are not allowed to enter. This is another kind of gender discrimination. The training goal declared by Ladies Class is to create a new type of women who are full of wisdom, extraordinary temperament, good cultivation and elegant manners. However, judging from the selection conditions and curriculum, its training target is more like a female secretary, or a "full-time wife" and "wife" of the elite. Essentially, this is a reflection of gender discrimination in women's employment in higher education. Based on women's unequal employment environment, women may not only be discriminated against in age, appearance, childbirth, etc., but even be deprived of the right to be a "lady" when receiving higher education. This is a greater inequality, a retrogression in history, and a violation of the fair principle of "education without discrimination".

The author believes that colleges and universities have the responsibility and obligation to improve the comprehensive quality and self-cultivation of female college students through more reasonable and practical curriculum, and strive to make them scientific, realistic, morally noble, artistic and urgently needed compound talents, thus improving their social competitiveness. However, colleges and universities should create better and fairer conditions for women's equal employment, instead of repeatedly "playing gimmicks" in the name of "improving women's employment competitiveness" to worsen the employment environment of female college students and aggravate gender discrimination against women's employment. As they get older, children will need gender awareness. It is a beneficial exploration and innovation for schools to teach boys and girls in accordance with their aptitude. Therefore, netizens should not rush to "pat bricks" first, so they may wish to see more results.

# Offering classes for boys and girls is the focus of sex education. # Su Yu: It is worthy of recognition that schools should strengthen children's gender cognition education. However, boys are gentle and girls are cool. Is it a gender dislocation? The cognition of gender is inseparable from the influence of environment, but it is more determined by nature. Faced with this situation, setting courses according to gender in schools not only fails to play a correct guiding role, but also may make students feel discriminated. The author believes that the focus of gender cognition education should be to help students understand the physiological and psychological differences between the two sexes, as well as the relationship, communication, cooperation and self-protection between the two sexes. What's more, boys can learn to knit sweaters, and women can also make great achievements in scientific research. In today's rapidly developing society, it is not only unfair to distinguish a person's career direction, work ability and hobbies by gender, but also violates the social progress and development trend.