Always busy as an excuse, no time to read. This time, under the pressure of kindergarten and the heavy responsibility of educating my son, I finally finished reading No Child Left Behind. It is really a good book to read in time. If you don't read it, you will regret it all your life. It is a good book to save children and cultivate an optimistic and perfect child. After reading this book, I said that the education I got from it is very important for children, and there are three aspects.
First, what kind of parents are you?
What will the child become? Whether children are gifted or mediocre, whether they have a positive outlook on life and love life in the future, everything can't be said to depend entirely on their parents, but it should be said that 90% of them have something to do with us, so what kind of parents are suitable for each child's education is the basis for cultivating good children. Are our parents capable of educating their children? This is a big problem facing China at present. Our own life orientation and life value orientation are still drifting, and there are still problems in our attitude towards life and things. How can we educate our children well?
Second, in what way?
Educating children requires us to know some psychology, understand human nature, understand children's nature, and follow the Tao to succeed. How to develop children's potential? Cultivate his interest in things? Very important. Seeing the stars on the earth, I also have a deep understanding. Don't easily identify a child as bad or stupid, which is extremely harmful to the child's young mind. What does it feel like if we adults are denied by others? I think children must be less tolerant than us, but in different forms. They may never cover it up with dissatisfaction and so on. What impressed me most was that Newton always liked to sit there alone. Some people say that there is something wrong with the child, and his mother says that my son is thinking. His mother knows that his son is different from others, and he knows to accept the child in a way that he can accept.
Third, do we love children enough?
We adults always say that I am doing this for your own good, and even we are said by our parents to be good for you. Everyone knows that good things can't be done. We must help the child to do something in a way that he can accept. You don't have to force him. You have to do this. You have to do this. You must get the first place in the exam. It's good to be the first in the exam. So what if you don't take the first place? Some parents force their children to do everything to satisfy their self-esteem. For example, children can play with snow in winter, but parents just don't let them, thinking that clothes need to be washed when they are dirty. Do you love him? That's self-love. Children don't feel the fun of playing with snow at all. In a person's life, it is important to feel, to experience different moods through different things, and to feel different stages of life. Yes, the way of loving is absolutely different from the way of not loving. Why is love great? Love is a miracle. There is no standard right or wrong answer to anything. People who like and love think it is good, and people who don't like it think it is wrong. Sometimes right and wrong are just between our thoughts, and have nothing to do with children. So I think we should first educate and manage children in the right way from the perspective of love. They must be children with bright future. Of course, children can't do whatever they want and always want to spoil them to the extreme.
Chapter two: Reflections on "No child can be badly taught"
Reflections on "There is no child who can't teach well"
A few days ago, I watched "No Child Who Can't Teach Well" and thought of an educational famous saying of the former Soviet educator Suhomlinski: "There are no students who can't teach well, only teachers who can't teach well." I think in reality, educators have different understandings of this view, and there are also voices of doubt while agreeing. Let me talk about my own understanding of this view.
First of all, what is the standard of a good boy? What is the definition of a "good" child who can't be taught well? In my opinion, teaching children well is not simply to let them win the first prize and get rewards, nor is it to require every child in the class to be an excellent student. We must teach children with poor grades as well as children with good grades. Because not every child is qualified to be a "home", there are individual differences among children and everyone is different. So the standard of "good" should also be different. In my opinion, the definition of a child's "good" should be related to the child's individual, and every child cannot be required by the same standard. The child's "good" can only be related to the child himself. A "good" child is to be the best child, and "teaching" a child is to make the child become the "best self". Instead of making all children "three good students". Children only need to make a little progress today than yesterday, and more progress tomorrow than today is enough!
It is a very high and lifelong requirement to let children become the best themselves. So this can only be regarded as a goal and pursuit of educating children. If we move closer in this direction, the children will get better and better!
Secondly, this article also reminds me to care for and help the students with learning difficulties in my class in the future. Because students with learning difficulties usually suffer more failures and can't experience success, our teachers always compare them with excellent students intentionally or unintentionally, and sometimes criticize and complain about them because of some of their performances, which often makes them feel helpless and give up their pursuit of life. Our teacher should first appreciate and respect students in attitude, and then develop a pair of eyes that are good at discovering students' bright spots so that students can experience success.
Chapter III: Reflections on "Education is not simple"
In June this year 165438+ 10, I carefully read "Education is not simple" edited by Yue Yajun. In the book, the author conveys to us the principles, paths and methods of how to observe and listen to students, how to take care of every different student, how to identify students' strength, how to predict problems, analyze problems and make thoughtful decisions. These practices, which really take place in the complex triangular relationship among teachers, students and disciplines, need not only teachers' academic ability, but also teachers' wisdom and love for education, which are beyond teaching skills.
Education is not simple. Jaspers said: education is the education of human soul, not the accumulation of rational knowledge and knowledge. Education itself means: a tree shakes another tree, a cloud pushes another cloud, and a soul awakens another soul. Education with soul means pursuing infinite spiritual life and the eternal ultimate values of human beings: wisdom, beauty, truth, justice, freedom, hope and love, and related beliefs based on this. "Every life is unique, every youthful life is full of personality and colorful, and everyone's way of expressing life is diversified. Education needs wisdom.
Every child is a flower, and this flower has its own blooming season. Once it finds its own flowering season, it will bloom brilliantly. Therefore, our teachers, especially class teachers, should learn to wait in the education of students. Learning to wait means that teachers can look at students with a developmental perspective and treat their work with a calm attitude: they can get immediate results without rushing for success, impatience or expecting an activity or a conversation.
As a teacher, as long as you take your children to heart, educate yourself well and enlarge your heart, you will find that life is always beautiful and you will love everything around you.