First, infringement of personal rights and interests Many people have the love to teach in remote mountainous areas, just to bring good education to local children. Moreover, there is a time limit for teaching, and these teachers have completed their five-year service period. Moreover, that place is very remote, far from family, and there is no way to honor parents and accompany children. These teachers completed their teaching tasks with great care within the contract time, and also completed the selection examination with their own efforts. However, there is no transfer procedure for teachers after the expiration of service in that place. This place itself lacks educational resources, so it is normal for teachers not to leave. However, it is also their right to choose to leave, which obviously violates personal rights and interests.
Second, there is a lack of local teachers' resources, but this forced retention behavior obviously causes contradictions, which also makes it impossible for teachers to teach in this place completely and the teaching quality cannot be guaranteed. This way of retaining people will obviously bring bad comments to local education, and will also make many teachers reluctant to go to this place.
Third, the official response and the lack of so many teachers resources in the local area have a lot to do with the local investment in education. Therefore, the official departments have also responded, and will strengthen subsidies for those teaching teachers and improve the general level. It will also solve the problems between teachers and schools transferred before, and try to give you a satisfactory answer.