Next, let's talk about the biggest beneficiary of this policy. In my opinion, many college students and some people in the society want to make a profit from this.
As we all know, parents nowadays attach great importance to education. After all, no one wants their children to fall behind others in academic performance. Therefore, business planning for students' education is really profiteering.
Therefore, there is a policy prohibiting teachers from making extra lessons. Then, all kinds of uneven remedial institutions will spring up like mushrooms after rain.
They may have been founded by people without teacher qualifications. Then go to the school teacher to give lectures and strive for maximum benefits for yourself.
Of course, there is another way, they will get more benefits, and that is to invite college students to give lectures.
In fact, it is very easy for college students to find tutors or give lectures in educational institutions. Because the operators of those institutions clearly understand that if teachers are hired in schools, the teachers' fees are very high. This will seriously damage their vested interests.
The students in those schools are not. They are new to the society, have no experience, and know that they are student unions, and their fees are relatively low. And if they are ordinary students, they can't tell the difference between college students and school teachers. In this way, those operators will get greater profits.
However, you should know that a teacher is a teacher after all. If you single out a college student, you can compare your teaching level with an old teacher with many years of experience. How is that possible?
Therefore, I think students may be the ultimate victims of this policy.