1, think that education and training institutions are insatiable money-making machines.
My organization mainly does discipline training in primary and secondary schools. Attend 1 class every weekend, which is a group class with no more than 15 students in each group; Each class lasts two and a half hours, and the charging standard is high school 240 yuan, junior high school 200 yuan and primary school 160 yuan.
Students can come to the campus to do their homework after school from Monday to Saturday afternoon, and the organization provides homework counseling services free of charge. There are also intensive training courses every night 1 hour, which are also free.
Many people accuse training institutions of always using high fees as an excuse. In fact, after full market competition, tuition fees are close to the bottom line. 9.9 yuan can buy 10 online classes, and pay 99 yuan information fee to go to offline institutions for 12 classes.
Frankly speaking, seeing such charging standards, as a practitioner, I feel that this industry has no face, and it is simply "selling" itself. 2. It is natural that education and training institutions will inhibit people's fertility will.
What is the biggest factor affecting people's fertility willingness at present? Everyone knows that it is the inflated housing price, the high cost of living, the anxiety of class solidification, and the spiritual awakening of advocating self. It is really unbearable for the education and training industry to carry the cauldron of "suppressing fertility will". There is an interesting fact. White-collar elites generally have weak fertility. Can't they afford to train their children? Obviously not.
It is funny to think that education and training are the "culprits" that affect triplets in life. Second, the education and training industry is almost impossible to close down. Some people cheered on the internet, and the education and training industry should be completely cold this time. I'm afraid I'll let them down again this time, because it won't close down, but it may usher in new development opportunities.
1, the strictest supervision is to protect its healthy development. Every industry will experience a careless era, and there will be a stage of disorderly plunder and blind expansion. At this time, it is necessary and timely for the relevant departments to introduce regulatory measures, severely punish and clarify the chaos in the industry.
Education and training institutions should have a correct understanding, actively embrace supervision, fully cooperate with rectification, make education and training develop healthily and make positive contributions to society. 2. The education and training industry has created a large number of employment opportunities. According to network data, the number of national education and training institutions will reach 200,000 in 2020.
At a time when the physical industry is suffering greatly and the epidemic situation is becoming more and more serious, this industry has contributed a lot of employment opportunities. In particular, it has accepted many college graduates and become a place where college graduates get together for employment. Most of the applicants in my institution are college graduates.
Most parents have no objection to their children's participation in extracurricular tutoring. A few years ago, most of the people in my institution who sent their children to cram schools were bosses, white-collar elites and locals with well-off families. Nowadays, many students come from ordinary working families and even migrant workers' families. There was a bus driver who sent his two children to cram school, and each child reported to the general department. His words are very real: I can only drive a bus in my life, and my children can't be like me. Ordinary families have greater expectations for their children's future, because they have recognized a truth: they don't want their children to live the same life as themselves, but they should study hard. If you close all the education and training institutions, tutoring will still go underground and grow more vigorously and savagely. Third, institutions and practitioners have two completely different mentalities. The boss of my organization is very unhappy these two days. He mortgaged two houses in Shenzhen in order to run an institution the year before last. Now that he has just made a profit, he is naturally uneasy when he encounters policy adjustment.
But then again, our organization has always been operating in compliance, and it still has a good reputation in the market, and he doesn't need to worry more.
It's much easier for the teacher to speak. Everyone thinks that if we really want to close the training institutions, there will be more opportunities to make money. It's not that the market demand is gone when the institution closes down.
On the contrary, market demand is likely to rise against the trend. Teachers with certain abilities can open their own studios and do one-on-one tutoring or family tutoring. Without the platform price difference, teachers can earn more. Frankly speaking, that's what I think.