He has a good stone on Fangshan, which can be used to cut jade.
Social drama is a beautiful article full of life interest. It depicts the lovely images of a group of farmers and teenagers, and reproduces the free and happy rural life by describing my experience of flying to Zhaozhuang at night in Pingqiao Village.
Sailing under the moon, Mr. Lu Xun drew a beautiful picture of Jiangnan water town by line drawing. Going home late at night, depicting the scene of sailing with vivid metaphors, full of fairy tales. In the picturesque scenery, children's free nature has been fully demonstrated, which is not redundant. I looked up a lot of information and found that the comments on the joke "watching social drama" were very short. For example, the Chinese Teaching Reference Book published by Jiangsu Education Publishing House has only one sentence: the author writes a scene of a play, closely combining the performance of the role with the children's reactions (language, movements, emotions), and writing it ups and downs and blending the scenes. Yes, after a cursory look, many people will feel that the author doesn't seem to make a detailed and realistic description like the above two parts, so that he thinks that it is just a plain narrative, which promotes the development of the plot and even paves the way for the following "going home late at night to steal beans", forming a wave of writing. Is this part really just a foil I don't think so.
Judging from the content of social drama, it is really not wonderful: I didn't see what I wanted to see-the steel-toed old man who could turn "eighty-four somersaults" but didn't turn somersaults, and the snake essence and jumping tiger that I most wanted to see were "gone many times"; Most of what I saw didn't interest me-Xiao Dan "sang" and Lao Dan "was my biggest fear", but he just sang "sitting in the middle chair"; The "best discount" that night was that "a clown in a red shirt was tied to a post" and was whipped. The content of social drama that is not wonderful is collected by the author. You know, this is all from a child's eyes, which obviously reflects the child's preferences: love to fight, love to be lively, and the important thing is the word "fun"! Don't hide your thoughts at all, this is the child's frankness and frankness!
Judging from the children's reaction, social drama has little attraction to them: "tired", just want to drink soy milk to refresh themselves; "yawn more" and "just talk to yourself", and the performance on the stage is no longer eye-catching; Double happiness they "muttered curses" and finally "couldn't bear it", turning their bows in the bristle. This is the child, who said what he thought without any scruples or hypocrisy, and finally left before the play was over. Although I swear, once I leave, my mood will remain unaffected and I will be as happy as when I came. This is the simplicity and transparency of children!
Therefore, I think the brilliant point is that social drama itself is not wonderful, but Mr. Lu Xun can write the process of "watching social drama" brilliantly. Similarly, the use of line drawing techniques, the performance of roles and children's psychology are closely combined to make the whole process of watching social drama interesting. For example, there is a sentence in the article: "I don't drink water, but I still watch it. I can't tell what I see." I just feel that the player's face is gradually becoming unfamiliar and the five senses are gradually becoming less obvious. There seems to be no height in harmony. " The students all laughed when they read this sentence. Why? For the children's true and naive psychology, it is also Mr. Lu Xun's simple and vivid words. Another example is Lao Dan's "Later, he sat in a chair in the middle", "Unexpectedly, he slowly put it down and sang in the same place", a word "competition" and a word "unexpectedly", which fully exposed children's dislike of the old man and made people laugh at his frankness, frankness and even rudeness.
To sum up, it can be seen that although the content of "Watching Social Drama" is not attractive in color and rich in auditory images, it is equally brilliant, especially the innocent and simple character of these children has been vividly expressed, which effectively highlights the theme of the work and is worth savoring.
How to make the teaching of this clip complement each other and be equally wonderful? My design is: first, let the students grasp the content as a whole and make clear from which two aspects they wrote. The students soon discussed that this was described from both actors and audiences. Then the following questions arise: who are the characters written and how do the audience react to their performances? Don't rush to answer, project thinking questions:
According to the first part and the content of the text, please do the second part to see who is the best!
The first part is: Lao Dan came out, which is disappointing.
The purpose of designing this problem is clear. It not only examines students' reading of the text content, but also trains students' ability to filter information (the first half is about the role, and the second half is about the audience). Also skillfully trained language expression (reading appreciation in this unit is arranged as antithetical couplet appreciation). More importantly, this form is difficult and interesting for junior one students, and it can stimulate students' awareness of independent inquiry. The answer I designed is: the clown is very happy to be on stage. The combination of the upper and lower parts summarizes the performance of the two most noteworthy characters in the social drama that night: the former is "most afraid" and the latter is "best", which set each other off and are very neat. First, the students discuss in groups. You say something, I say something, give directions to each other and discuss together. Then the whole class communicates, and each group chooses a representative to speak. There are various answers, such as "I'm tired of playing", "I'm tired of playing", "The clown was beaten, funny", "The clown came on stage, happy", "Xiao Dan babbled, bored", "The old man beat, disappointed" and so on. Some students are ingenious, summing up the performances they didn't see, such as "iron-toed (old classmates) don't turn over (somersault), which is boring" and "snake spirits are sad when they don't see it". Of course, when students answer, they are also required to tell the basis and listen to other students' comments, which is bound to link the specific content of the text with their own unique experience, guide students to enter the text, and then walk out of the text to achieve an effective interpretation of the text.
This teaching practice tells me that Chinese teachers should study the textbooks before class, accurately understand the author's intentions, and use the new curriculum concept to guide teaching behavior, in order to present a brand-new, dynamic and attractive classroom!