In fact, it can be seen from the educational model that foreign countries pay more attention to cultivating children's associative self-judgment and thinking expansion ability. As long as you look at the seats in the classroom, you can know that there are many primary schools in the west, surrounded by communication and great freedom. In Asia, primary and higher education are arranged at different levels, and teachers have different humanistic influences on students. We classify being different as rebellion, and we will be under potential pressure from the crowd. In contrast, foreign openness, especially primary education, will not set up an established template for you to imitate, and once you are not within the scope of this template, there will be no problem, on the contrary, it will have an encouraging effect.

As for the game machine, I think it can be explained as follows: there is a line in a foreign movie that is a little impressive. A young man stole a state senator's car and shouted at him, "video games are my only education, and you want to deprive it of your shit bill!" " Games, in the process of customs clearance or exploring game content, will unconsciously exercise our judgment or association ability, which is a kind of intellectual development. Of course, indulging in it will do more harm than good. Our parents put the worry of "playing with things" on the priority of thinking too much. Because first of all, you have no confidence in your education-if you have no confidence, you will have no confidence in your children. Secondly, there is no scientific way to guide children or teenagers' attitude towards games (which is also a loophole left by parents when they received education in their early years), so foreign parents will naturally actively consider it because they have different emphases and save more experience than us.

I hope I can help you ~