Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Educational Knowledge - Cramming education is destroying talents. What do you think of this statement?
Cramming education is destroying talents. What do you think of this statement?
Cramming education is destroying talents. What do you think of this statement?

In fact, cramming education is an indoctrination education. In my opinion, the first spread of cultural education ignored the main role of the educational object. On the one hand, communication culture education transcends the ideological level of the object to be disseminated and ignores the development law of people's thoughts and personal behaviors, so it can't contact the specific concepts of the object to be educated, which limits the promotion of the object to be educated; On the other hand, the dissemination of cultural education ignores the subjective initiative of the communication object and resists the enthusiasm and creativity of the education object. The subject of communication regards the object of education as an object that can be manipulated at will, and thinks that the actual effect of spreading higher education is related to the intensity and time of communication. As long as "strong communication and hard irrigation" are carried out continuously, good results can be achieved.

The content of duck education is relatively simple, and the development trend and innovation of basic theory are seriously backward. The content of transmission education is mostly a dogmatic understanding of Marxist-Leninist theory, which violates the true connotation of Marxist-Leninist ideological system and the law of development of the times. In addition, the spread of culture and education is often seen in the spread of Politics and Metallurgy, which is contradictory to the intersection of other basic theoretical viewpoints. For example, during the Cultural Revolution, the compulsory measures of "implementing what you know and implementing what you don't understand" severely cracked down on experts with different academic concepts, and China lost many top talents.

Cramming culture education lacks sincere emotional communication. In the process of inheriting education, a single basic theory is often used to talk about teaching methods. The teaching methods are rigid and weak in image, which cannot resonate with the educational objects, making the inheritance culture education a cracked and boring preaching culture education. In addition, the main body of communication behavior is usually arrogant and lacks investment in work, which makes the communication of cultural education contain certain administrative rules and regulations, regardless of the specific concept of the educational object and other problems that must be solved. The transmission of educational objects can not produce scientific world outlook and methodology, which makes the transmission of cultural education lose its practical effect.

The main quality of duck education is not high, which can not meet the demand. On the one hand, the discipline of communication education itself lacks complete basic knowledge and fails to grasp the spirit of Marxism-Leninism in spreading higher education, which leads to the derailment of its knowledge structure and the requirements of communication objects; On the other hand, the ideological quality of the subject of education is not too high, so it is impossible to teach by example and lead by example, and then it is impossible to move people with emotion. The long-term compulsory transmission of cultural education has suppressed the personality development of the educational object and affected the classroom effect.