Because it takes a long time to go through legal procedures, the prosecution results have not yet come out. In this female teacher's school, the evaluation of professional titles depends not only on personal points, but also on voting scores, and the proportion of voting scores is very large, which makes many teachers feel unfair. The female teacher's personal score is the second, but because other people's voting scores are relatively high, so her final score can't be rated as a professional title if she doesn't squeeze into the top few. The voting score is generally decided by the leaders and judges. The female teacher thinks that as a teacher, she should pay more attention to students rather than get on well with the leaders, but if she doesn't get on well with the leaders, her voting score may not be too high and she won't be rated as a professional title, which makes her feel unfair.

And this situation is not only this year. The teacher didn't get the title for several years because of his low voting score. From the teacher's personal rating, we can see that she is a very good teacher, so an excellent teacher should evaluate the professional title. After all, other schools don't have voting scores. If this teacher had been in another school, he would have been rated as a senior professional title. Later, after the teacher exposed the situation of the school, he reflected the matter to the Education Bureau, and the Education Bureau also investigated the matter, saying that no violation of discipline was found, which means that the Education Bureau believed that the voting process was absolutely fair and just.

In my opinion, there should be no admiration for the voting process, but I think the unreasonable voting environment will make teachers pay more attention to maintaining the relationship with leaders rather than improving their teaching quality and lose the original intention of evaluating professional titles. So I think this school should cancel the voting score and only use personal points to evaluate professional titles. If you have the same personal points, it is not too late to score by voting.

I have been doing my job diligently, but I can't compare with others as an administrative teacher every year. It will be difficult to accept any teacher. After this incident, the teacher did not give up defending rights, but wrote a complaint to the Education Bureau. However, the Education Bureau did not reply to the teacher within the specified time, so the teacher sued the Education Bureau. I think the final result of this incident should be that this school has reduced the proportion of voting scores, but because of this teacher's behavior, she may be rejected by other teachers and leaders of the school, and even look at her with special respect, so I suggest that she re-enter another school, so that she will not fail to evaluate her professional title every year. I believe there should be no problem with this teacher's personality, but he pays too much attention to teaching and will not deliberately maintain relations with others.