In view of the fact that education and cultural undertakings owe too much over the years and the foundation of cultural undertakings is weak, the proportion of financial investment in public welfare cultural undertakings should be doubled in a relatively short period of time. Government functions are both absent and offside, so we should pay special attention to five aspects:

1. Large-scale infrastructure construction for public welfare cultural undertakings;

2. Large-scale enrichment of facilities and resources for public welfare cultural undertakings, including library collections and other resources;

3. Expand the staffing of public welfare cultural undertakings. Take it as an important way to solve the difficulty of college students' graduation and employment. This is a long-standing phenomenon. If libraries, art galleries and memorial halls are established, many employment opportunities will be provided for high-level talents.

4. Strengthen aesthetic education in primary and secondary schools. This is to create consumers in the cultural field, and it will also strengthen the efforts to solve the employment problem of more people. At present, the proportion of "English, physical education and beauty" teachers in primary and secondary schools is low.

5. Pay too much attention to the local economic development, education pursues the enrollment rate unilaterally, and cultural undertakings tend to pursue economic benefits.

At this stage, we should rely on financial disclosure.

At this stage, financial opening should rely on the extensive participation of experts and scholars, and rely on the public to solve the problem of financial capital investment through the participation of civil liberties, that is, deliberative democracy.

First of all, we should change the concept of government functions. With the gradual formation of market economy, the main function of the government in the economic field is no longer as a direct investor in the market, but mainly to do public welfare undertakings and serve the society with public finance. There should not be too much in the industrial field, but we should increase our efforts in public welfare undertakings, and we should shift from grain finance and construction finance to public finance.

Second, financial input should be made public. In the field of fiscal and cultural expenditure, it is necessary to publish more specific subjects and data of fiscal and cultural expenditure and accept extensive supervision from the public.

Third, in the direction of financial investment, we should listen to the opinions of experts, scholars and the public and conduct necessary discussions. How much financial investment in cultural undertakings should be strengthened should be an academic and public discourse, not just a matter for a few budget makers. This is the basic way to solve the problem of insufficient financial investment in cultural undertakings by democratic means.

Financial opening has just started, and it is far from reaching its goal. But to achieve the goal, it is not particularly difficult technically. The purpose design of finance department should be scientific, standardized and detailed. But the current finance is incomprehensible and very rough. Some tricks are hidden under some big and popular themes, so be specific.