In China, off-campus training institutions have indeed been effectively rectified, and the Ministry of Education has also issued a series of documents and policies aimed at regulating and governing off-campus training institutions. These policies include limiting the number of training institutions, requiring training institutions to have qualifications, stipulating training content and duration, and strengthening supervision.

In EU countries, the government has also taken some measures to regulate and supervise off-campus training institutions. For example, the Dutch government has enacted the Education Law, which stipulates that students must complete their studies at school and cannot participate in other educational institutions after class. In addition, EU countries also require all educational institutions to meet certain qualification requirements and accept the review and supervision of regulatory agencies.

In the United States, the management of off-campus training institutions is relatively loose, but the government has also taken some measures to regulate and supervise these institutions. For example, the United States Federal Department of Education requires all educational institutions to meet certain qualification requirements and accept the review and supervision of regulatory agencies. In addition, some American state governments have also formulated relevant laws and policies to regulate and supervise off-campus training institutions.

Reasons for canceling off-campus training institutions

1. Control the educational chaos: The existence of off-campus training institutions has aggravated the educational chaos. In order to pursue profits, some institutions ignore students' physical and mental health and all-round development, and there are some problems such as running schools in violation of regulations, false propaganda, and super-class teaching in advance. Therefore, the government takes measures to rectify and standardize off-campus training institutions to curb the intensification of educational chaos.

2. Improve the quality of education: Some off-campus training institutions have some problems such as false propaganda and exaggerated teaching effect, which makes some students and parents blindly choose these institutions and ignore the core role of school education. Canceling off-campus training institutions can promote students to return to school, receive formal education and teaching, and improve the quality of education.

3. Reduce the burden on students: The existence of off-campus training institutions increases the burden on students, and students need to spend a lot of time and energy to participate in various training courses, which will affect their physical and mental health and learning effect. Canceling off-campus training institutions can reduce students' burden and give them more time and energy to devote to their study and life.

4. Promote education equity: Some off-campus training institutions have geographical and income level restrictions, which makes some students unable to enjoy quality education resources. Canceling off-campus training institutions can promote educational equity and give more students the opportunity to receive quality educational resources.