From the perspective of educational development, it is not necessary.

First, it is against the fairness of education, and it is a bit high-profile. This is the fact.

Second, this division not only limits the development of students, but also limits the enthusiasm and creativity of teachers.

Thirdly, there are two examples. The first is the late Sun Weigang, a Beijing math stunt teacher, and the second is a teacher in an ordinary middle school. After six years' training, more than 20 students in a class were admitted to Tsinghua Peking University. This shows that poor children can become great talents without poor children, and grading means giving people three or six grades, which is a serious injury to self-esteem.

The second example is Singapore's education reform, focusing on reforming the "deep-rooted" diversion system:

People with good grades can go to the best schools and have a good chance to study abroad and get first-class public office in the future. Those with poor grades will enter the technical and vocational system, and the government has not stopped this screening mode. ...

Singapore's reform can be said to be a reflection on its decades-long stratified education. The confidence of famous schools is obviously better, but the happiness index is not high. Although the achievement rate is high, it also brings many problems.

We don't want to take the old road of being abandoned by others, which is a subject that the education department should pay attention to.

I think it is necessary to "divide the key points into ordinary classes" Liu Ming is a graduate of our school this year. In the final exam of senior two, his score was the first in his class, but he ranked more than 200 in the county. On the third day, the head teacher talked to him and said, "With your grades, it is absolutely no problem to graduate from No.1 Middle School in Kang 'an Township in the third grade, but there is a big problem if you want to enter the key classes in No.1 Middle School. If you can continue to work hard and improve your study methods, I believe it is possible to enter a key class in No.1 Middle School within one year! "Liu Ming is very obedient, and he has been more energetic since then. When he graduated this year, he was admitted to the fortieth place in the county and successfully entered the key class of Anxiang No.1 Middle School.

If there is no focus and no ordinary class, maybe Liu Ming won't work so hard and surpass himself a lot in the senior high school entrance examination. Therefore, I think that dividing key classes into ordinary classes can promote students to study hard and move towards higher goals. If all the students are put together, the students with good foundation will not have enough to eat, and the students with poor foundation will be exhausted. After the placement, teachers can adopt different teaching methods according to the overall level of the class and reasonably grasp the teaching progress. For example, in Anxiang No.1 Middle School, the same teacher teaches both ordinary classes and key classes, but the teacher will adopt different teaching methods in class, so that every student can gain something in one class.

If you don't divide classes, when the teacher talks about a knowledge point, some students who are particularly quick-witted, or what we call smart students, have long understood it. Even when the teacher asks questions, he can draw inferences from others. However, some students are still in a state of ignorance and don't understand at all. This is actually a difficult choice for teachers. They should go on or go deeper and analyze this knowledge point more thoroughly, or go back and tell it again so that those students who don't understand can learn it again. So it is helpful for students to study in different classes.

Of course, both key classes and ordinary classes are not static. For example, Changde No.1 Middle School conducts a comprehensive examination of students every year. If the students in ordinary classes are excellent, they can enter key classes. On the contrary, if students in key classes regress quickly, they will flow into ordinary classes. This is actually an improvement for students.

Conclusion: Although it seems unfair to students to divide key classes into ordinary classes, it is actually a kind of protection for students. It is necessary to concentrate teaching in different classes and at different levels. Especially in the junior high school graduating class and high school stage, it is particularly important and prominent. Some people object that even the superiors have document requirements, and junior high schools are not allowed to divide key classes into fast and slow classes. Find out what reasons to support this.

Is it effective to teach in different levels (classes) according to students' actual learning? Is this the right way? No one cares, and we can't just talk about theory. Only practice knows that practice proves effective is the truth.

Why do junior high schools and senior high schools with excellent grades basically have placement teaching measures? Practice has proved that this is an effective way to improve teaching quality and stimulate students' interest in learning, so it is being adopted. Just a different name.

The supporting reasons of the teaching measures in different classes;

First, it must be admitted that students' learning ability is different. Some students are good at accepting and understanding, while others are poor. Therefore, the basic grades are not at the same level, and the ability to accept and digest is not at the same level.

For example, only 53% of the reference number of graduates can be promoted to ordinary high schools in Zunyi City, Guizhou Province in 2020. It shows that there are differences in students' academic performance.

Looking at admission, the minimum admission score for a model high school is more than 557 points. The average admission to high school is above 330 points. Explain that students' learning ability and academic performance are different.

Second, according to students' academic achievements, the implementation of classroom teaching is targeted, in line with students' reality, and is conducive to teaching and students' better development.

For example, students with 600 points in the senior high school entrance examination are concentrated in one or two classes, and those with more than 550 points are concentrated in two classes.

The advantage of this is that the student base is basically the same. Teachers can teach students in accordance with their aptitude, solve the problem of "having enough to eat and eating well" and avoid the problem of "not being able to digest and not having enough to eat". Conducive to teaching students in accordance with their aptitude. Students' personality development.

This can create a better learning atmosphere, stimulate students' learning enthusiasm, help students tap and develop their potential, and promote teaching results.

Third, it is beneficial for teachers to give full play to the classroom teaching effect and achieve the purpose of improving teaching performance.

Classroom teaching is the key to improve students' academic performance. Teachers are the key to a good class. Teachers will design teaching plans according to the students' reality, close to the students' reality, so that students can learn, learn, accept and digest easily. Learning will be more energetic and receive better classroom teaching results. So as to achieve the purpose of improving performance.

Fourth, students are more interested in learning and have higher consciousness.

The students have almost the same foundation, know that they are basically on the same starting line, and have a positive ideological understanding. No one wants to lose to others or fall behind. The gap should not be too big. This creates an overall motivation for hard work and progress. Naturally form a learning atmosphere of comparing and catching up. I will be more conscious and will work harder.

In a word, different classes and different levels of teaching methods have been proved to be effective in practice. That is, it is targeted and conforms to the reality of students. It should be supported, not banned. But it is not necessary in primary school and should not be advocated.

I have been a teacher for many years, and I said from the bottom of my heart: No matter how many students there are, students' learning situation is definitely different, so the placement of classes can really promote students with good learning foundation and have less influence on relatively poor students. As long as there is nothing wrong with the teacher's equipment, it is still beneficial to divide classes. However, when most schools divide classes, there are often problems in the allocation of teachers: especially those irresponsible and stress-free ideas, which often ruin a group of students by being teachers in poor classes. So I hope the school will not be divided into classes. Only teachers who don't divide classes can compete fairly and students can get equal treatment.

I don't think it's necessary. Everyone is talking about specific cases. Let me also talk about a few examples that are not suitable for "key ordinary classes".

Some people were directly assigned to key classes after the senior high school entrance examination, but they really didn't like politics, history and geography when they were in the first year of high school, so they rushed to learn science. As a result, because the test scores dropped too much, they were artificially assigned to ordinary classes.

There are still some students in the key class of Grade Two, but they are not interested in Chinese and English, or they have not found a good learning method because of their previous experience. I can understand these two courses, but I can't do anything during the exam. And some other great gods who didn't listen to anything in these two courses returned to 130+ in the exam. This also led to the students in this key class being artificially transferred to ordinary classes.

There are many corresponding examples. What I want to say is: if we judge whether these students can understand the class by the test results, we can't achieve high accuracy.

I can understand the lectures, and I can't keep up with the teacher's thinking, but I didn't do well in the exam (probably because of interest and methods); Or the partial subjects are serious, and some uninterested classes simply don't want to spend most of their time on study, which leads to a decrease in overall grades. These phenomena may lead to the original good students being labeled as inferior to others or irresponsible to themselves.

Perhaps the purpose of school placement is to teach more efficiently, or to use "incentive mechanism" and "sense of honor" to make students study harder. This will play a certain role, just as someone mentioned that students with high scores feel that they speak too slowly in ordinary classes and need to improve in key classes; Or students with low grades need to study in ordinary classes because the key classes speak too fast to understand.

This simple division is unfair to students in other situations, don't you think?

I'm @ gama. I need to say something to you. Welcome to comment in the comments section.

Take my high school as an example. There were no fast and slow classes in high schools at that time. I can clearly feel that when the teacher talks about a knowledge point, some students react quickly, or we call them smart students, and they already understand. Even when the teacher asks questions, he can draw inferences from the other. However, some students are still in a state of ignorance and don't understand at all. This is actually a difficult choice for teachers. They should go on or go deeper and analyze this knowledge point more thoroughly, or go back and tell it again so that those students who don't understand can learn it again.

Now many schools will divide students into fast and slow classes, experimental classes, rocket classes, basic classes and so on. Many people think that this kind of placement system is very necessary and belongs to teaching students in accordance with their aptitude; However, many people think that this method is unscientific and unreasonable, which will make children assigned to slow classes feel inferior, feel that they are rated as poor students, and have consequences such as being tired of learning.

In fact, hierarchical teaching or individualized teaching has a long history, and the most typical representative is Confucius. Many of his allusions and teaching classics embody and permeate his teaching philosophy of teaching students in accordance with their aptitude.

Originally, there are no exactly the same people in the world, and everyone will have their own advantages and specialties. Take learning as an example. Some people are good at remembering, others are good at understanding, some people are used to jump thinking, some people are used to learning step by step, and some students may learn slowly and remember slowly, but remember firmly, so different people have different characteristics. If children are taught in a unified way and a unified curriculum, some people will certainly adapt.

Let's take the college entrance examination as an example. Students who have passed 90% of the exam may not have fully mastered the basic knowledge, while those who have passed 120 may have begun to learn the deeper contents of these knowledge, so it is really difficult for two students to take care of each other in the same class and taught by the same teacher.

Therefore, I personally think that it is necessary and feasible to divide classes according to students' understanding ability, learning characteristics and knowledge mastery.

However, when placing classes, the principles and standards of placement should be transparent. Every student and parents should understand the reasons for placement, so that students and parents can avoid misunderstanding and think that they are labeled as poor students or dull and stupid, which will affect children's enthusiasm for learning and make them feel inferior.

There is no need to divide classes when there are few people. If there are many people, it is necessary to divide the key classes into ordinary classes.

Let's start with reality. Junior high school and senior high school are basically divided into classes.

For the school, the reason for doing this is also for the enrollment plan. Only by paying attention to training can talents be produced more easily, excellent people will be better together, and there is more hope for being admitted to key schools.

Why do you want to take the senior high school entrance examination and college entrance examination?

Why did you choose a prestigious school after the senior high school entrance examination?

What are the standards of prestigious schools?

Generally speaking, the more high-flying schools there are, the easier it is for people to think that they are famous schools.

So that everyone can understand the necessity of resettlement.

Stratified education is certainly desirable. To quote Deng Xiaoping, rural areas and cities should allow some people to get rich first.

Why didn't he say let everyone get rich together?

Because everyone's conditions are different. Later, he said, get rich first, and then get rich.

In fact, like the placement, the placement of key classes and non-key classes is to train a group of talents first.

To give another popular example, good wheat and bad wheat cannot be sold at a good price together, but they can be sold at a good price separately.

Confucius said that it is normal to teach students in accordance with their aptitude, with ordinary classes and key classes. People who ask such questions, their children are definitely not in key classes, and hope to win the sympathy of netizens in this way. Education is only relatively fair. Why don't those people blame themselves for not giving their children more educational resources? Why is there a distinction between ordinary universities and key universities in society? Why are there 985,265,438+065,438?

Have the parents who said this ever thought that if your child is in a key class, do you want to be surrounded by students with average grades? Everyone wants to be surrounded by people who are helpful to them. You think so, others think so, so hierarchical education is desirable.

Children's learning ability is strong and weak, so teachers can teach students in accordance with their aptitude and stimulate their potential in competition. In the past, one of my brother's children was not very serious in school, but the exam was always in the top of the class and the ranking in school was not so good. When I arrived at the key class of the second grade, I saw the gap and immediately got serious. Now my child has been admitted to 985. In his words, it is too important to associate with excellent people!

I think it is necessary.

Generally speaking, children's learning ability is strong and weak, some have a solid foundation, and some have a weak foundation. Then, if the group with good grades and strong self-learning ability is put in the same ordinary class, it will cause a certain waste of qualifications and even seriously drag some children's hind legs. Similarly, if the children with poor grades are in the same class as the children with good grades. What the teacher said is easy for children with good grades to accept, while children with poor grades can't keep up with the teacher's rhythm, which leads to learning difficulties.

Generally speaking, stratified education is conducive to teaching students in accordance with their aptitude, and those children with good grades are more likely to promote their growth, and the circle of top students will certainly form a benign competitive environment, which is conducive to the rapid growth of children.

Children with poor grades are assigned to another class, and they can get more support from teachers, more counseling, more patience and attention.

Of course, everything has advantages and disadvantages, and the disadvantages of stratified education cannot be underestimated. Will cause the Matthew effect. The stronger the strong, the weaker the weak. The strong are more and more confident, and the weak are more and more self-deprecating.

Of course, hierarchical education is a good practice, but it should also provide certain promotion channels for some classes with poor grades. Through their efforts and efforts for a semester, they can jump to a better class to study. Give special praise and encouragement to some students who have made remarkable progress in their grades, and invite them out to share their learning methods and experiences, thus encouraging other students to strive for the top and not to be left behind.