In the face of examination questions, we should carefully read every word in the questions, grasp the key words, think calmly, examine which aspects of our own quality and ability are important, accurately grasp the proposer's intention to write the questions, and make a good draft according to the usual training. If possible, we should make full use of the draft paper provided by the examination room, simply list the outline of the answer, quickly introduce it from familiar fields, calmly organize the answers, and then speak it in an orderly and logical way in accurate and concise language.
Second, combining theoretical analysis with examples.
As the saying goes, "Facts speak louder than words", and case argumentation will make your point more convincing. Everyone wants to show their most perfect and authentic side to the examiner, and such questions are particularly taboo. Generally, they emphasize how strong their plans are, which is not only boastful, but also not convincing. At this time, if we can properly quote examples from life, we can get twice the result with half the effort. Even problems that can be proved in theory, if supported by practical arguments, can make their views more rigorous and impeccable.
Candidates with work experience can be said to have organized a travel activity during their work. When talking about organizing activities, they must talk about the success of the activity organization and its good influence among colleagues. Candidates who have no work experience can be said to have organized college students' art festivals, calligraphy competitions and singing competitions. When it comes to organizing activities, the most important thing is to talk about whether the activities are successful, whether they have received the expected results, and how the students have responded.
In the process of answering questions in an interview, it is very important to speak with facts and data. Of course, the enumeration of such examples is not limited to the matching degree between job hunting motivation and the proposed position. For other problems, such as comprehensive analysis, planning, organization and coordination, we can quote classic examples from life. This will not only enrich the content of our answers, polish our answering process, but also receive unexpected results. Therefore, in the usual training process, we must strengthen the cultivation and improvement of this aspect of thinking ability.
Third, get rid of the routine and pay attention to individuality.
Interview questions are open-ended and there are no standard answers. Many candidates pursue "standard answers" when preparing for the exam, which is actually unnecessary. If everyone speaks the same word, the examiner is bound to be aesthetically tired, which is not conducive to selecting talents. When answering questions, candidates should make the questions concrete and life-oriented, and strive to create bright spots. Candidates need to remember that the test questions are alive, and only by integrating their own thoughts, personal cognition, examples and experiences with the test questions can the test questions be vividly and stereoscopically presented.
As far as traits are concerned, strong boys must show strength and stability; If you are timid and introverted, you can exert your emotional integrity; Girls with ability and strong professional color should return to frankness; If you are not mature and shy, you should give people an impression of exquisiteness and practicality. As far as experience is concerned, those with work experience can contact actual work experience and fully answer questions; Fresh graduates can talk about it from the perspective of understanding. There is no specific answer mode. Candidates should make up for their own shortcomings as much as possible while giving full play to their personal advantages.
Fourth, language usually emphasizes sincerity and seeking truth from facts.
When answering the interviewer's questions, many candidates tend to be clever, use too much embellishment in their answers, and pay little attention to honest, rigorous thinking and objective answers, which are often unable to justify themselves. It is a common practice to skillfully hide the real needs of job seekers behind the interview questions when interviewing. At this time, if you just cater to it blindly, you will soon be out. Seeking truth from facts means that in the interview, when answering the examiner's questions, candidates should proceed from their own actual situation, completely get rid of insincere empty talk, big talk and lies, fully explore and combine their own life experiences, and fully show their true glory to the examiner. Even in the face of your own mistakes, you should be brave enough to admit it, and never show off your interview skills to fool the examiner. The interview response is not acting, nor is it a speech contest. Candidates should clearly understand that the interview examines the candidates' true views, opinions and levels. Therefore, candidates should adhere to their own quality and principles when answering, and strive to be sincere and tell the truth.
Structured interview is a main interview form in civil service examination, which mainly examines five scoring elements: comprehensive analysis ability, planning ability, organization and coordination ability, adaptability, oral expression ability and demeanor.
First of all, in terms of speech expression, there is no separate question, and the examiner scores according to the actual performance of the candidates' answers. Candidates are required to answer questions with a loud voice, use Mandarin as much as possible, express accurately, concisely, easily and vividly, avoid empty words and phrases, pay attention to grammatical stress and logical stress, and answer questions in an orderly and logical way. Try to use ordinal numbers, that is, the first, second or transitional words, that is, the first and second, candidates are prone to lose points in this respect, one is low voice, the other is incoherent answer, and the third is mantra.
Secondly, in gfd, it is required to be full of mental state, dignified and tidy, suitable for the professional characteristics of civil servants' work and the interview examination room environment. Try to be natural and graceful, behave gracefully, express your feelings with laughter and convey your feelings with your eyes. Some candidates don't pay much attention to etiquette, and it's easy to lose points. For example, after entering the door, I don't know where to stand at attention, bow, say hello to the examiner, and don't know how to say thank you when I leave, but leave in a hurry; Others are glassy-eyed, only staring at one place, not knowing how to communicate with the examiner with their eyes, too serious; Some are too humble to bow their heads; Some people sit incorrectly, dance and shake their heads ... failure often lies in the details. In short, how to make and dress hands, feet, back, eyes, face and lines should be carefully designed to win the favor of examiners and achieve good results.
Thirdly, in the aspect of comprehensive analysis ability, it mainly tests the comprehensive analysis ability and judgment ability of candidates, including the clarity and pertinence of opinions, the novelty and distinctiveness of opinions, the depth, breadth and logic of analysis, and the order and persuasiveness of expression. The first angle of this topic is social hot spots and focal issues, such as the construction of a harmonious society, Scientific Outlook on Development, education of honor and disgrace, anti-corruption and people's livelihood. The second is metaphorical topics, such as "those who wash dishes often play with bowls, those who don't wash dishes don't play with bowls, those who play with bowls are criticized, and those who don't play with bowls are praised." How to treat this phenomenon in real life? " This kind of topic should pay attention to the analysis from phenomenon to essence. The third is to combine the candidates' personal proposition with the exam itself, such as introducing your personality characteristics, or asking your opinion on the civil service exam and how to carry out your work if you compete for posts. In short, candidates should pay more attention to politics, have a high degree of political sensitivity and have a high theoretical literacy.
Fourth, the ability to plan, organize and coordinate mainly requires candidates to do one thing, how to arrange and plan. In this regard, when answering questions, we should pay attention to the thoroughness and feasibility of the plan, the organization and flexibility of the work, the steps in the implementation process should be rigorous and the priorities should be clear. Pay attention to planning in advance and summing up afterwards. Also pay attention to the positioning of identity, such as "you are the head of the work team and carry out a public welfare activity of' making the elderly happier' with young volunteers. How will you work? " At this time, your identity is not a candidate.
Finally, in terms of adaptability, it refers to testing whether candidates can think and solve problems quickly and flexibly under pressure, and whether they can improvise and make correct decisions. This kind of topic is similar to "sharp turn". From the perspective of proposition, one is a situational topic, such as "If you go to an important meeting of a superior department, you see an old man lying unconscious on the side of the road, surrounded by a group of people. What are you going to do in the face of this situation? " Another writing question is to give five words, asking candidates to organize a short story, or asking several idioms to make up the story from beginning to end.
In short, structured interview has now become a scientific, forbidden, fair and just examination method, with dialectical thinking, scientific time control and correct and peaceful mentality. Only by fully understanding and carefully preparing for the exam can we grasp its laws and achieve ideal results.
Fifth, it is well founded.
The interview questions of civil servants (Weibo) focus on critical thinking, so there is generally no standard answer. Two typical interview questions are: "What is your greatest strength" and "What is your greatest weakness". This kind of question seems simple, but it is actually difficult to answer. Candidates can easily fall into an embarrassing situation where they can't continue to answer. The key to solve this problem is to be able to justify itself, that is, to stick to the theme, find an angle as the starting point, make it clear, logical and reasonable. This can add highlights to your answers and increase your chances of getting high marks.
Sixth, the position is clear and not extreme.
Civil servants serve the public. We should look at things and deal with problems from the people's interests and stand on the people's side. Therefore, candidates who take part in civil servant interviews should analyze problems from the perspective of civil servants, not only from the interests of individuals or a small group, but also pay attention to balancing various relationships. If candidates don't know much about the civil service industry, the best way is to pay more attention to national affairs and social hot issues; If you have no practical work experience, you should pay attention to collecting information related to the position you are applying for, try to think about how to carry out a specific job, and practice writing some official documents such as investigation, research, handling problems and formulating strategies to accumulate relevant knowledge and experience.
Seven, rational analysis of emotional expression
Interview is not only a test of ability, but also a form of examination. In previous interviews, the relationship between examiners and candidates was mainly mechanical question and answer. Examiners are like answering machines, and candidates are like answering machines. The interview between the two sides adopted a mechanical question-and-answer method, which obviously failed to select the most real talents. However, the actual situation now is that the interview of civil servants in China has begun to return to the essence of the interview-"seeing the real person, seeing the truth, understanding the truth, and choosing the true talents". In the topic setting, candidates are required to communicate with the examiner with true feelings and transform themselves from an answering machine into a person with flesh and blood, soul and feelings, which can arouse the emotional resonance of the examiner and finally pass the interview. Therefore, candidates should tap the true highlights of their own lives, identify with the civil service profession from the deep heart, establish a sense of service, responsibility and kindness from the deep heart, express their views in plain life language, and impress examiners with true feelings.
Eight, the correct performance of qualifications
In the civil service examination, generally speaking, all departments will put forward some basic conditions for the positions they want to recruit before recruitment, and candidates should fully show their advantages in the interview according to these conditions. But we should pay attention to:
1. Targeted. Applicants need to be fully prepared before the interview to understand the nature of the position they are applying for and the characteristics of the talents they need. When you answer, you should describe yourself selectively and promote yourself for different departments or different jobs in the same department. Be sure not to be limited to a certain mindset, but to analyze specific problems and highlight yourself with goals and objects.
2. Refuse to be grandiose. In the process of expounding oneself, it can be properly beautified. This is a strategy, but we should avoid overdoing it, otherwise, we will often put ourselves in an embarrassing situation.
Step 3 focus. When describing your own advantages, you should highlight the key points, especially your own unique advantages. There is a simple reason. The focus is on your characteristics, which is your advantage. Being too comprehensive means these may be your weaknesses.
4. Clever avoidance. Everyone has advantages and disadvantages, some of which are harmless and some may seriously affect the success of the interview, so you should correct your shortcomings in the interview and don't be too outspoken. For the short board, it should be properly packaged before it is launched, and the short board should be turned into an advantage as much as possible. After all, introducing yourself to others is selling yourself to others. In the competitive mode, good sales skills are extremely important for success.