In today's society, it is a general consensus, a social reality and an objective requirement of social development to rely on ability and technology to eat. Industry competition, post competition is becoming increasingly fierce. If a person does not have good body, knowledge, culture, technical skills and moral concepts, it is difficult to find a job he likes or wants. There is a saying in China that "the disciples of the church starve to death". That's the truth.
The same is true in international social and economic activities. Because China's industrialization revolution started late, it lags behind developed countries in many scientific and technological projects. Especially in space technology; Engine manufacturing technology; Chip development and manufacturing technology, etc. , are far behind the developed countries. They took advantage of research and development, stuck us in the neck for a long time and didn't sell us money. ZTE and Huawei are good examples.
To sum up, we can realize that technology has exclusivity, confidentiality, exclusiveness and high added value. This is still the case between countries, and there is no moral concept. Key technologies can't wait and can't be bought. If you want to survive and develop, you must rely on yourself to "learn, learn and learn again"; Try, try, try again.
This is the self-protection mentality of normal people, and there is nothing wrong with it. According to the popular saying: intellectual property protection. Selfishly speaking, it is reasonable and legal to pinch work.
Of course, on the premise of keeping a job, it is also possible to transfer to a post to teach with pay, which is legal and recognized by the society, otherwise there will be no titles and occupations such as schools, teachers and masters in society. Without their communication and promotion, the precious skills and excellent experience of the past could not be inherited and carried forward, and it is not a problem that the new things researched, invented and created by scientific and technological personnel cannot be popularized and used now. How does society develop, progress and prosper?
On the other hand, if you don't invent and innovate yourself, you can learn from others, or learn from others in colleges, technical schools, factories, workshops, workplaces and fields, right? Whether you want to teach others or not is entirely your right and freedom, and others have no right to ask and blame. The social competition is fierce, and it is not easy to earn money to eat and support the family. Who wants to be a foolish teacher who teaches disciples to starve to death? So don't worry about yourself and resent others.
To put it another way, it is not a long-term solution to blindly close yourself and conserve technology. If the skills you master are in great demand or in short supply, you can start classes for students and charge them, and seize the opportunity to earn more tickets. Why not try it? What a pity to rot stunts and miracles in your stomach!
Answer at the invitation of "Little Secretary Wukong"!
What is the mentality of not wanting to teach your skills to others?
When I was a child, I heard old people say that ancient ancestral crafts, such as the secret recipe of cooking wine and the prescription of treating diseases, such as the treatment of traumatic injuries that have been circulating in my hometown for more than 100 years, were passed on to boys and not to girls, because they would compete with him for jobs when they got married, and they kept it a secret because they were afraid that it would not be passed on. If there is no son at home in the end, you will have to be a husband. These conservative ideas are not to pass on technology to competitors in order to feed and warm generations!
Why did the ancients advocate the relationship between heaven and earth, this master? The teacher's position is behind the parents. Only when the master teaches you skills can you survive. The ancients paid attention to hungry craftsmen in famine years. If the master looks at the apprentice's bad conduct and doesn't respect him, you can't learn his skills. According to the old man, apprentices used to be very hard, and it was simply a man's job. In the morning, he will pour the urinal for his master, clean up, and do farm work in the field.
In the past, there was an ancestral Chinese medicine shop in our country, which could process Chinese patent medicines. Pills, pastes and powders had to be baked, boiled, cut and dried. The apprentice didn't want to learn the tricks of processing, and spent three years teaching some general skills. He was afraid that someone would open a drugstore nearby and rob him of his job, and he would learn technology after three years.
Thank you for reading!
This is the traditional concept of private ownership, and the essential feature of private ownership is selfishness!
The ancients had a family system of "passing on children but not daughters", and even had the teaching of "teaching disciples to starve their masters". Capitalists often shelve advanced science and technology for their own interests, fearing that their existing technology will lose the market and affect cost recovery. Some technologies have been abandoned by capitalists for decades, even hundreds of years, which is selfish!
The practice of socialist China is completely different from that of capitalist countries. It actively develops and utilizes new technological achievements, and transforms science and technology into new productive forces as soon as possible for the benefit of mankind. This is why China is catching up with the United States.
The United States has no choice but to take repressive measures to curb the development of China. However, the wheel of history is rolling forward, and those who drive history backwards are doomed to fail!
I read a newspaper report before that the formula of Coca-Cola was escorted from China to the producing country by special plane.
No matter which country's own technology, why apply for individual patents? Why should it be protected by law?
It is to encourage you to invent, not to get something for nothing and get the fruits of others' labor. It's that simple. A normal state of mind.
From the perspective of technical people, what kind of psychological state is it? The following types of analysis are possible:
1. I'm not confident enough about myself. I'm worried that the technology will be passed on to others, which will affect my position. I may be not confident enough about my technology.
2. The output ability is not good. Many people may know everything, but they just know it clearly. If they want to output logically, it will become difficult. Sometimes it is not that they are unwilling to teach, but that they may not be able to teach.
3. Refuse your own technology. The major in others' eyes is not worth learning in your own eyes, which wastes time.
Unwilling to teach others and only teaching yourself are two different mentalities. It is a very narrow family concept to teach only one's own people. This concept holds that technology is a means for families to make a living. If outsiders know, it will have a market impact on it, that is, grab the rice bowl and eventually leave their descendants without food. However, his descendants may not like the same job or the technology. So many ancestral technologies have been lost in the process of inheritance, which is not only the loss of their family, but also the loss of all of us.
Some people don't want this ancestral craft to be lost, so they will accept apprentices. However, with the changes of the times, some crafts are no longer suitable for the market demand, and no one wants to learn. I remember a story told in the movie "A Hundred Birds at the Phoenix". It is really a pity that many folk skills are slowly lost because they are not well protected.
The other is unwilling to give it to others. I think there is nothing wrong with this idea. This is normal. For example, I spent a lot of energy and time learning my psychological counseling skills. Why should I give them to others for free? We all say that intellectual property rights are protected. Even the Tang Priest in the Journey to the West has to give some money in the end. Why should I teach others for free?
If someone pays me to learn technology, I am willing to teach others. But this award is worth paying, and I think it is fair and reasonable. So I think there may not be anyone who doesn't want to teach others. It's just that people who want to learn are not sincere or have insufficient money.
Answer the question, that's all. Welcome to Yi Ming Psychology!
According to the copyright law, there is nothing wrong.
Learn Chinese medicine, not to make money, but to learn for your own health. Only one's own health can help others do something. This is one of them.
If you have that condition, you can also help others alleviate some pain. I have always known that learning Chinese medicine should not be aimed at making money, so that I can have a deeper understanding of Chinese medicine and improve my understanding of Chinese medicine.