Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Educational Knowledge - What do you mean by weighted distribution?
What do you mean by weighted distribution?
Weighted scoring is a commonly used term in the testing and evaluation of education and psychology. Its main purpose is to adjust the test balance effect and better explain the test result score.

When it comes to weighted score estimation, many people don't know what it means, but many candidates in Class 20 18 should know it. What does this mean? Let's talk about the meaning of weighted assignment first.

0 1 weighted score is a commonly used term in the testing and evaluation of education and psychology. Its main purpose is to adjust the test balance effect and better explain the test result score. Weighted scoring provides a systematic process for selecting projects based on many criteria. After assigning weights and scores to each item, the weighted score is calculated by multiplying the weight of each standard by its score and adding the result value.

02 20 16 5438+06 5438+0 The weighted scoring event of Zhejiang English College Entrance Examination is a controversial event caused by a large number of systematic scores deviation of Chinese and English subjects in People's Republic of China (PRC) Zhejiang College Entrance Examination 20 18 65 438+0. The weighted score of college entrance examination English subjects is a major liability accident caused by serious decision-making mistakes.

03 event background

According to the pilot scheme of the new college entrance examination in Zhejiang Province, the scores of ordinary high school academic level examinations are directly linked to the college entrance examination, and the scores of selected subjects are included in the college entrance examination scores through scoring, but they do not participate in scoring except the number of languages, and are calculated according to the original scores.

The subjects selected for the academic examination are 3 out of 7 subjects, and the results of the selected subjects are not directly included in the college entrance examination. The grading system shall be implemented, with a full score of 100 for each subject. Under the premise of passing the senior high school entrance examination, the results will be determined according to the proportion announced in advance. 3 points for each grade, 40 points for the starting point.

In the English subject examination just ended on October 20 18, 165438 10, it was found that some items were more difficult than the same period last year.

In order to ensure that the difficulty of the test questions is roughly the same among different exams, Zhejiang Recruitment Committee organized experts to study and demonstrate, and decided to face all candidates when formulating the scoring rules, and adjust the difficulty coefficient of the difficult test questions in the second part (reading comprehension) and the third part (language use) to implement weighted scoring.

Other issues have not been adjusted.

04 social inquiry

Zhejiang Education Examinations Institute was originally scheduled to announce the selected subjects and foreign language scores on the evening of165438+1October 23rd, but the actual announcement time was165438+1October 24th. After the announcement of English scores, there is a phenomenon that the final scores of a large number of candidates with high scores on objective questions are obviously lower than the expected scores, while those with high scores on objective questions generally have low composition scores, and even the objective scores estimated according to official answers are greater than the difference between the final scores and full marks, that is, the composition scores are negative? Pour extra points? . It is generally believed that this exam is difficult, and the overall scores of many middle schools are even higher than in the past, which has aroused doubts from all walks of life and questioned the fairness of the college entrance examination. 2018165438+1the evening of October 25th. Zhejiang college entrance examination English? Hot topics on Sina Weibo hot search list. According to the data of New Media and Public Opinion Research Center of Henan University, in? Zhejiang college entrance examination English? The reading volume of Weibo's topic reached 1. 1 100 million times, and the discussion volume reached 35,000. And, at the same time? Three out of seven? Subjects have also been problematic. The website of 20 18 12 1 CCTV issued a document saying that the final number of people who took the physics examination in 2016 was 28,000, but the actual score was deviated. According to the rules of the safeguard mechanism, the corresponding number of candidates taking the physics examination should be at least 42,000.

05 government intervention

20 18 12 1, the Zhejiang provincial government information office said that the Zhejiang provincial party Committee and the provincial government attached great importance to this incident and decided to set up an investigation team headed by Governor Yuan Jiajun and attended by relevant authoritative experts to investigate and verify, and the investigation results will be announced to the public in time.

On February 5th, 20 1865438, the Information Office of the People's Government of Zhejiang Province published the results of the survey on weighted scores of English subjects in the national college entrance examination in 2016 10. It was found that the decision-making basis for weighted scores of English subjects in the national college entrance examination was insufficient and the decision-making was seriously wrong, which led to unfair and unreasonable results. And cancel the weighted score of this exam and restore the original score. At the same time, the investigation team ordered the decision-maker Zhejiang Provincial Department of Education to issue rectification measures to the society and formally apologize; Guo Huawei, director of Zhejiang Education Department and secretary of the Party Committee, was ordered to be dismissed; Wang Yuqing, secretary of the Party Committee of Zhejiang Education Examinations Institute, was removed from office and was put on file for review by Zhejiang Supervision Committee. Dean Sun was admonished; Chen Yujun, secretary of the Commission for Discipline Inspection, was put on file for review by the monitoring group.