Based on the results of hundreds of years of history, the direction of correction is not only the discrimination against African Americans (and their descendants), but also the concern about gender and religion.
Can we promote equality and avoid historical retrogression?
This way of allocating quotas in proportion has indeed achieved considerable results.
This bill is still in force because it promotes all kinds of people to get education and resources more fairly.
Personally, 20 13 opinion polls show that people are already willing to accept the emergence of a female president.
To some extent, it is also one of the effects of implementing affirmative action.
But there are also voices of opposition, such as the emergence of "reverse discrimination".
In fact, the biggest controversy focuses on the "right to education" of universities.
In the past, the space of white men was squeezed.
In recent years, it has been found that white women have also begun to fight for their rights.
These two types of people are the first two types of people who have achieved social success statistically.
On the one hand, the affirmative action bill has achieved the results of diversification and integration; on the other hand, people who have lost their interests will rise up and oppose the continued implementation of this bill.
Supporters of the affirmative action bill believe that if such measures are not continued, the present society will only become more narrow.
Sincerity is a highly subjective policy direction.