When we were in high school, although our teachers were all high school teachers, there were still some differences in academic qualifications. Most high school teachers graduated from undergraduate courses. However, in recent years, the proportion of high school teachers with postgraduate degrees has increased year by year, and some high schools also have teachers with doctoral degrees. Personally, I don't think the gap between these high school teachers and teachers with ordinary education is as big as we thought. It doesn't mean that teachers with high academic qualifications are necessarily better than teachers with ordinary academic qualifications.

First of all, we have to admit that highly educated teachers have more advantages in theory. They often like to make some bold attempts in the process of teaching students knowledge, which may make students interested in learning and gain different learning experiences. However, these high school teachers with high academic qualifications may lack certain teaching experience compared with teachers with ordinary academic qualifications.

Only when these highly educated senior high school teachers work for several years and truly understand that students are constantly summing up experience and methods in their own work can they really give full play to their academic advantages. If they are only ill with high academic qualifications and can't adapt to the work of high school teaching, then I personally think that academic qualifications can't be an important factor to measure the gap between teachers' teaching ability. Many times, the gap between teachers should be measured from the perspective of students' academic performance. Of course, in addition to this aspect, it depends on whether students really like and recognize their teachers, which often has little to do with the teacher's academic qualifications.