They will ask: without exams, there is no competitive psychology, and without competitive psychology, there is no ambition. How can I learn well?
A: Stupid mouse, you can't see through this. Let me tell you, I ask you, what is self-motivated? You mean soldiers who don't want to be generals are not good soldiers? Ha, ha, ha. A man is motivated because he wants to be better than others. Why is he better than others? Because they want to be different, get ahead and be envied by others, isn't that selfish? Is it ridiculous that a person who only cares about material enjoyment and self-improvement should instigate others to care about their status and desire for pleasure as he does? Don't laugh at me, we are human beings, not the kind of racial animals who just want to get a position or material enjoyment in reality. If you say so, everyone should strive to get rid of others and then stand at the highest point and despise everything? There are the strongest people and the weakest people. The fundamental purpose of quality education is to make people not only pursue material enjoyment like animals, but also care about the spiritual world. What are you trying to tell me? Then there is no competitive psychology. Who will work, who will invent? Are you stupid? Quality education is to make people feel a sense of responsibility and honor and shame, and to restrain the selfishness of human nature. A truly healthy person will be very eager for knowledge, because he is a quality person who lives a spiritual life, so he greedily absorbs knowledge. What do you say about such a person? Said he couldn't invent it? Do you know Thomas Edison? Did he invent it for the sense of competition?
However, the quality of the examination does not necessarily decline.
Did I mention that? Are you deaf? There will be the best and the worst in the exam, and the worst students will give up on themselves (ibid.) ...
But should we cancel the exam? If there is no exam, how can we test a person's study? There are also civil servants. How to choose without exams?
Are you an idiot? Without exams, everyone's quality education will rise, their sense of honor and disgrace will rise, and their knowledge will increase. Do you still need an exam? When selecting civil servants, everyone is a quality person, so they will objectively evaluate themselves, and then whoever is suitable will go and whoever is not suitable will not go. It is because of exams that civil servants need them. Because the exam will lead to no quality, no quality to test, that's all. But do you still need to take the exam after everyone has the quality?
Just put it around the exam and discuss it in the spiritual world, and you will win. I don't agree to cancel the exam. Because it is impossible to improve quality at one time now, there are other objective factors in quality education, such as family, but if he asks this question, you can answer it like this: it will be better to cancel the examination quality education, but it will always be better. There is a big loophole in this article, that is, if he asks you about the exam at the beginning, he may not have negative thoughts. If he asks, then you need information. You can collect information yourself, so you don't need me to help you find it.