The meaning of this sentence is that the popularization of legal knowledge should be changed from extensive to more precise and personalized ways to better meet the needs of different groups of people.
Flood irrigation is a way to popularize legal knowledge, that is, through large-scale publicity and education activities, more people can understand legal knowledge. The advantage of this method is that it can quickly cover a large number of people, but the disadvantage is also obvious, that is, it is not targeted enough to meet the needs of different people.
Precision drip irrigation is a more personalized and precise way to popularize legal knowledge, that is, different methods and contents are adopted according to the needs and characteristics of different groups of people to achieve better results. The advantage of this method is that it can better meet the needs of different groups of people and improve the effect of popularizing the law, but it needs more energy and resources.
The change from flood irrigation to precision drip irrigation means that the popularization of legal knowledge should be changed from simple legal knowledge popularization to more personalized and precise popularization.
Transformation mode of popularizing law:
1. Change the concept of law popularization: from the traditional concept of "text-centered" to the concept of "user-centered". This change means that the law popularization work should pay more attention to the needs and experiences of users and provide corresponding legal knowledge and services according to their needs and problems.
2. Innovative methods of popularizing law: Traditional methods of popularizing law usually adopt simple publicity and education activities, while modern methods of popularizing law pay more attention to innovation and diversification. For example, using social media, short videos, online courses and other ways to popularize the law can better attract users' attention and interest.
3. Strengthen interaction and participation: Traditional law popularization work is usually one-way, while modern law popularization work pays more attention to interaction and participation. For example, we can interact and communicate with users through online forums and question-and-answer communities, so as to better understand users' needs and problems and provide personalized solutions.
4. Individualization and precision: Traditional law popularization work is usually a "one size fits all" approach, while modern law popularization work pays more attention to personalization and precision. For example, we can classify and analyze the legal popularization objects by means of data analysis and artificial intelligence, so as to better understand their needs and characteristics and provide personalized legal popularization services and contents.
5. Integration and cross-border cooperation: Traditional law popularization work is usually the task of a single legal field or department, while modern law popularization work pays more attention to integration and cross-border cooperation. For example, we can unite many departments, institutions and experts to jointly carry out legal popularization work. These cooperations can better integrate resources and services, and improve the effect and quality of law popularization.