As a candidate in Hebei, I, like the candidates in Jiangsu and Hubei, have been adversely affected by the expansion of enrollment. However, it should be pointed out that some people and netizens who don't understand the actual situation in society can't and shouldn't simply equate the reduction of recruitment with so-called social problems such as administrative corruption, inaction for officials, or officials deceiving the people and people opposing officials.

What is reduction? To put it simply, it is to divide the admission places of colleges and universities in relatively developed areas into remote and backward areas in the central and western regions. Its basic consideration is to maintain the fairness of college entrance examination, social stability and eliminate regional differences. It can be said that the formulation of this policy is of positive significance to poor candidates in underdeveloped areas in the central and western regions, such as Guizhou, Yunnan and Tibet. Then why is there such a big controversy because of the public interest and the long-term stability of the country?

Mainly in this process. Some problems about the reduction of enrollment areas, candidates and parents;

Such as the degree and scale of reduction, and what is the basis for division and ruling? Why are Hubei and Jiangsu provinces reducing their holdings so large? Why do Beijing, Tianjin and other places enjoy the best educational resources and high enrollment rate in the country, but they don't make any cuts and stay out of it? Is this a just act of flaunting fairness? Why did you do everything from beginning to end, but didn't give the parties, that is, the candidates and parents of the party whose interests were damaged, the right to express their opinions at all? ....................................

Regarding the above questions, as for how to answer and how to answer them, I still hope that all parties concerned can answer them properly. The college entrance examination is a national event, and the reform is welcome, but it should be steady and gradual. Only by ensuring the interests of the majority as much as possible can such reform succeed.