Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Educational Knowledge - How to understand the relationship between teaching and moral education
How to understand the relationship between teaching and moral education
The relationship between moral education and teaching is two aspects of a whole, which are interdependent, mutually promoting, developing together and complementing each other. Without a good foundation of moral education, students have no motivation to learn, and they don't know why they study, so it is impossible to really improve their learning quality. Only by doing a good job in moral education can students enhance their sense of self-discipline, have a good environment for teaching and improve teaching quality. On the other hand, without solid teaching work, students' learning quality will not go up and moral education will lose its foundation. In other words, moral education without learning quality is empty and meaningless. For the growth of students, we should not only pay attention to intellectual education and activities. As far as teachers are concerned, of course, we should be moral educators as well as educators.

School work is a systematic project. Although it can be divided into two parts: moral education and teaching, it is true that you have me and I have you, and no one can live without anyone, and no one can live without anyone. Moral education and teaching are two horses in front of the carriage. Only by keeping abreast can they rush to the front as quickly as possible.

(A) the classroom should be the main battlefield of moral education. For a long time,

We always think that the classroom is a place to impart knowledge and carry out teaching work. As long as our knowledge is instilled in students, we think this class is good. But we are also carrying out moral education while teaching in the classroom. While imparting knowledge to students, we are still educating and influencing students with our own thoughts and character. We educate students with correct ideas, influence students with noble character, and students are willing to accept your knowledge, otherwise they will not buy your account, appreciate your feelings, refuse your knowledge, and our classroom teaching will be difficult to achieve results.

(2) Moral education is a real work, which must run through the whole teaching process. I think moral education is a real job only by promoting teaching, otherwise it can only be regarded as empty talk. If our moral education can't be implemented in teaching, can't encourage students to study with peace of mind, can't improve the teaching quality of the school, and can't train useful talents for the country, what's the point of our moral education? This kind of moral education can only be a failed education, which is unrealistic and must be abandoned. Therefore, when we moral educators consider moral education teaching, we should first think about whether it is conducive to the development of school teaching, and each of our teachers should also think about whether it is conducive to students receiving knowledge and growing sturdily when educating students. If our moral education goes against school teaching, it will not promote students to accept knowledge. On the contrary, it makes students feel resistant, and this kind of moral education must be reflected and changed. Therefore, I think moral education cannot be divorced from the reality of schools and students. We must understand and study students' ideological trends and learning attitudes in time, which should be the focus of our moral education, otherwise it will be empty talk.

Moral education is not an empty job, not a castle in the air, but a real job implemented in teaching, which we must have enough understanding.