Different people have different opinions. Personally, I think science education and intellectual development are necessary, but there is a limit to everything and we can't go against the law of natural development. This kind of "cleverness" is not necessary to develop intelligence prematurely. So here to correct a few misunderstandings:

First, the earlier the early education, the better

There is a trend in early education, that is, the earlier it starts, the better. As a result, advanced education and advanced intellectual development have emerged that are arbitrarily beyond children's age. Children begin to learn to read and calculate arithmetic soon after birth, so that four or five-year-old children can learn arithmetic and Chinese textbooks in primary schools. Some even advocate that the problems to be solved in primary schools should be advanced to three years old, such as "literacy at 0 years old, literacy at 3 years old" and so on. This is a typical practice of quick success and instant benefit.

Second, early education is advanced education.

The development of children and adolescents is a long-term process. In this process, early science education is necessary and important. However, this kind of scientific early education should be especially cautious, especially in the content of education. We should not mistake early education for intellectual development, or even advanced intellectual development.