I have experienced many curriculum reforms from the initial syllabus to the later curriculum standards, and I have also had study abroad experiences like Wei Shusheng, Dulangkou Middle School and Yang Si Middle School. However, the reform seems to have changed little. If compared with 20 years ago, the change is still quite big, at least the concept has changed a lot.

Quality education is aimed at rigid exam-oriented education. So today, there are still many people who say that quality education is the opposite of exam-oriented education. Anyone who says exam-oriented education is definitely not quality education, or is going from one extreme to the other.

Quality education is the official formulation. Many experts have reservations about quality education, or directly deny it, thinking that the formulation of quality education is inappropriate. I don't remember who that man was. Should also be a heavyweight in the domestic education sector.

In order to embody quality education, every school is engaged in various extracurricular activities, such as the second class, to let students learn Confucianism, engineering, agriculture, art and so on. To prove that their school is implementing quality education. It seems that a consensus has been reached that we should take more courses, that is, quality education. This practice is very common, but it is often because the teachers are not unified, the courses are random and not scientific and rigorous enough. It seems to give students more choices, but it is actually a waste of students' time, which is tantamount to quality education.