According to the survey, the utilization rate of English-educated people is only 10%, which means that only 10% people can use it in their own lives and work, and 90% people have learned it but have no chance to use it. In order to let everyone accept English teaching, it is undoubtedly a waste of a lot of social resources to recruit more English teachers, build more English language laboratories and offer more English courses.

Second, highlight educational equity.

As we all know, compared with other courses, English teaching requires higher requirements. Teachers and hardware facilities in developed areas are better than those in underdeveloped areas, and cities are better than rural areas. This shows that English education is "too poor to love the rich", which will be "congenital deficiency" for students in underdeveloped areas and rural areas, unlike Chinese and math classes, which can be made up by hard work.

Children in developed areas and cities can not only enjoy high-quality educational resources, but also attend English training classes. In the face of increasingly fierce competition, English stands out, and it is against educational fairness to list English as the main subject.

Third, effective measures to reduce the burden on students

With the disappearance of English as the main subject, society, schools and parents naturally pay less attention to English, and the related English training classes and homework are reduced, thus allowing students to have more time and energy to engage in hobbies.