If success comes from teaching students according to their aptitude. Then, excuse me, is the so-called "educational method that can be widely promoted" not contradictory to the successful opposite sex? Putting forward empty and general kind words and empty words is nonsense without educational power. Once there is no clear and radical educational method, it is equal to no educational effect. Besides, any success is risky, and so is the success of education.
That is just a convenient angle to describe the utilitarian effect of education, and does not represent the position of parents or educators. Excuse me, in the educational environment, do most people regard academic success as a symbol of educational success or an important bargaining chip? Children grow up under the hint of such an environment, and their psychological growth has to pay a huge price. The so-called educational achievement covers the conscience of educational means and is only a level of value judgment. In reality, the severe academic competition from outside is the main source of psychological injury.
Then, I want to ask, noble personality, elegant humanity, great public contribution, these wonderful works of education, can you tell us the exact educational conditions they need? In the eyes of many parents, Xiao Baiyou really succeeded, and only under the harsh yardstick of those educational theorists can he barely pass. I would like to ask, under such harsh standards, how low will the taste of thousands of ordinary families in Qian Qian, Qian Qian be? Xiao Baiyou is not a pioneer in educational experiments, he is just an ordinary parent.
All children can be harsh and won't cause any shady harm. The premise is that this correction only occurs at the specific behavioral level. This kind of harshness has clear boundaries. As long as children are convinced of the existence of free and relaxed space, they can believe that children have great potential in enduring the density and tension of individual education requirements.
Parents' rudeness and blindness in the choice of educational concepts and methods are not the only manifestation of "will imposition". In fact, the problem of "will imposition" is international. In modern society, many things imposed by will are only communication barriers, not human oppression in China's traditional education. In reality, many parents just talk about it, and the specific behavior is not as extreme as the stereotype.
The educational thought of tiger father and wolf mother originated from a militarized training method. The essence of this thought is to resolutely complete the established tasks, and it is a parallel educational way of thinking, psychology and body. The so-called exam-oriented education, its educational thought is only to complete the simulated battle in thinking. In order to shape the quality and character of a series of task standards, it is necessary to cultivate discipline, and in order to cultivate discipline, specific reward and punishment measures become necessary. Examination-oriented education only cultivates order, not discipline. Students are punished because they lack order, not discipline. In this way, the weakness of exam-oriented education is exposed to lazy body and empty psychology.
Success in the real world is the combination of mind, mind and body. No matter what the standard of testing students' success in the field of education is, no matter how it describes the road map of success, parents always have a choice. No matter how absurd the exam-oriented education is, children always have extra energy and discipline to emphasize themselves.