Professor Sato introduced the teaching reform he advocated, and what I gained the most was my contact with Professor Sato's learning community theory.
Learning community is driven by vision, concept and activity system.
Vision = The school is not only a community where children learn from each other, but also a community where teachers learn from each other and parents and citizens learn from each other = The school ensures that every child does not fall behind and realizes the learning rights of all children. No teacher will fall behind, and all teachers can grow into experts.
(2) Philosophy = popular philosophy, democratic philosophy and outstanding philosophy.
③ Activity system = based on mutual listening = collaborative learning in the classroom, establishment of peers in the teaching room, parents? Citizens' "Learning to Participate".
Why can "learning community" become the guiding driving force of school reform in Asian countries?
? The first reason is that "learning community" has revealed the vision, concept and activity system of the most advanced curriculum teaching and learning in 2 1 century schools, and its effectiveness has been proved.
? The second reason: the "learning community" conveys Will With < Synergy > that our learning is organized, which guarantees every child's right to learn and realizes high-quality learning. "Learning community" is the practice of pedagogy, which is based on the frontier research of educational science and learning science.
? The third reason: the "learning community" organized the teachers' learning community through the teaching reform, and realized the teachers' self-discipline and their peers as experts.
? The fourth reason: having a "learning community" foundation, our concept has resisted the neo-liberal ideology and prepared for a new democratic society.
The application of learning community theory in teaching.
1. Is it better to divide the group into several groups?
Group cooperation should be a group of four people and a group of two in grades one and two.
If there are five or six students in a group, some students may be talking, some studying and some watching, which is not conducive to cooperative learning.
2. Is cooperative learning the same as cooperative learning?
Cooperative learning and cooperative learning are both ways of learning, but they are different. Cooperative learning means that students solve one or several problems, and team members may do one thing in division, such as some research problems 1, some research problems 2, some record, some experiment and some observation. They are dividing their work. In collaborative learning, we do one thing together, observe and record together. They study together without division of labor.
Group cooperation should be about the same level of members in the group and then cooperate together. Different levels will become the performance stage for good students, and the underachievers will not be improved. Group cooperation needs homogeneity within the group.
Collaborative learning requires heterogeneity within the group and homogeneity outside the group. In other words, the four students in the group have different levels and they study together. The level between groups is the same, so there is competition between groups.
3. Is learning community theory the same as the group cooperation we apply?
Our classroom application group cooperation is only used to solve a difficult problem in the classroom, a big problem, a difficult problem, and everyone cooperates to solve it. After the cooperation is completed, the team is useless.
Learning community runs through the whole process of learning, which is a whole, learning new lessons together, doing homework together, taking exams together, grading groups together and solving problems together. I think this is a form of class organization. In our class, some head teachers divide the class into several groups to manage, which is the form of learning community. In our school, students are divided into four groups, with desks arranged together and four people studying together. The four members of this group share a common vision, a common goal and a common pursuit, and they become a whole. This organizational form conforms to the theory of learning community. The more accurate definition of group cooperation mentioned by Mr. Gao in his report some time ago should be learning community.
4. Collaborative learning is quiet, and communication is whispering in the ear, not noisy.
In our class, the whole classroom was boiling during the group discussion. If the voice is not loud enough and lively enough, the teacher will feel that the discussion is not enthusiastic and stimulate students to discuss it loudly again and again. But after listening to Mr. Manabu Sato's report this time, I don't think so. Teacher Manabu Sato said that group discussion should be conducted on the basis of individual independent thinking. When you encounter problems in the process of thinking, you will communicate quietly with the students in the group. That is to say, you will communicate in the group only when the bottleneck problem cannot be solved. Communication is not talking about your own views with the other party, but exploring ideas and methods to solve problems. The key point is to keep quiet, and it is best not to affect the students in other groups.
This is my mind map compiled according to the report.
1. The concept of cooperative learning: Cooperative learning refers to a teaching theory and strategy system that promotes students to help each other in heterogeneous groups and accomplish learning tasks together, based on the overall performance of the group. Mainly through group learning to achieve common learning goals, and to achieve the optimization of individual and partner learning effects. 2. The concept of cooperative learning: cooperative learning means that knowledge is not directly transmitted to students, but is formed through active dialogue and communication in the process of understanding concepts and applying skills. Collaborative learning is to realize the sharing of meaning among group members, and the knowledge as the basis of learning is constructed by society. 3. Similarities and differences: Similarities: 1, both of which are a form of group learning. 2. Both learning methods have their own common group learning goals. Difference: 1, different group members. "Cooperative learning" is composed of students with similar level in a class; "Cooperative learning" is composed of students of different fields and levels. This group has different goals. The purpose of the collaboration group is that Qi Xin will work together to achieve common goals and members will teach each other; The goal of the cooperation group is to construct new knowledge and solve problems. 3. The process of solving learning tasks is different. There is a cooperative relationship in cooperative learning, and cooperative learning is realized through cooperation. 4. Differences in evaluation. The two strategies are very similar from goal to learning organization; Cooperative learning and cooperative learning blend with each other in many practical applications and do not exist independently;