I can understand it this way:' teaching' is the policy and' education' is the fundamental purpose. This constitutes the education system in China.

I'm afraid this topic will involve an old story. One day in class, the teacher did an experiment in our class, which was still very impressive. Maybe it gave me a lot more theories than usual. Here's the thing: there is a well-known enterprise president who is almost 40 years old, not to mention money and reputation. As far as his position is concerned, it is sought after by many people. From the perspective of a college student, should we exchange identities with the president of this enterprise, including money, age and education? Of course, this is just a hypothesis. The premise is that today's employment situation is not optimistic, and this college student does not belong to that kind of "market demand" talent.

Unexpectedly, more than 40 students present all chose not to exchange. Including me, of course. This experiment only ended in laughter, but it caused me to think about "education in China". It intuitively reveals the psychology of students now, and all students' thinking has been "formatted". Of course, it is not excluded that some students "follow the crowd". At that time, when considering this issue, I chose "no exchange" without hesitation. I think a person's life depends on whether he has pursued it. It doesn't matter what the result is. I believe that most students who choose this way have such a mentality. Because our thinking has been patterned. If the shape of children's thinking is diversified, it may be a star, a diamond or a circle. Then "quality education" is like a measured mold. According to its established shape, all students' thinking becomes the same form. Perhaps in youth, it has become a finished product.

When it comes to Yang Di, maybe people will say "fatuous". I believe that everyone can't be truly fair, but history is undeniable. It is true that he wasted people and money, and it is also true that he let the Sui Dynasty end like this. But who can guarantee that he didn't make any contribution? Isn't the Grand Canal a good example? But when most people think of the Grand Canal, they only talk about how Emperor Yang Di ruled. This is all because we just conform to the development of history. Just follow the "model" of education.

Maybe education in China is to give a definition. And we must keep these "propositions" in mind and supplement the details in due course.

Perhaps many students, even teachers, will complain about the education system in China. More than ten years of study career, just for a paper diploma. I think this is probably the biggest difference between China education and western education. We pay attention to theory, while they care about practice. China's 5,000-year history seems to have this trend from a very early time. Whether it was the imperial examination system established in the Sui Dynasty or the later stereotyped writing of literati. It restricts people's thinking and development to a certain extent. In this way, education in China will always be in the same state.

I want to talk about my views on "nine-year compulsory education". The first is "obligation", which is like a yoke that imprisons our thoughts. It is believed that learning must be completed as a mission. This has become a burden. How much can you gain if you don't study out of your own interest? Isn't this a waste of national financial and material resources in disguise? Now most students have another view, such as a friend of mine. I just symbolically want to waste nine years of my life on study, which not only makes me learn nothing, but also increases my physical and mental burden. I wasted my time except the criticism of my parents and teachers. Therefore, China's education system is not perfect, and it can even be said that it is not formulated according to the actual situation. This kind of education directly leads to students' resistance to learning. Think that all these years of study are for diplomas? However, what can I do if I get it? Can you guarantee a foothold in society?

The essence of education is that it can change some viewpoints in our hearts and make us analyze this society more rationally and realistically. However, if education is like a shackle that directly locks our thoughts, wouldn't it be a departure from the original intention of education? In the heyday of the Tang Dynasty in China, Japan was just an island country that was subjected to Crusades everywhere. Why can Japan become a developed country today? I think it is inseparable from its education system. Japanese attach importance to education, but encourage innovation. They study history in order to see the future policy, but what about us? Learn a lesson? Think hard and think sweet? I want to say that since it has become history, let's discuss "Why did the Sino-Japanese War fail? Why do you want to close the door? " Is it unnecessary? When I say this, I don't want to "grow the ambition of others" to denigrate China. I just want to express my views on education from an objective perspective. I don't appreciate Japanese education. Their teacher-student relationship may be rigid. Only from a certain point of view, Japan is still worth emulating.

Generally speaking, there are still many disadvantages in education in China. I don't want to target anything, maybe what I see is only the superficial phenomenon. What I want to say is: Give us more space, and maybe there will be a miracle. Education is not to imprison our thoughts, but to broaden our thinking and make more innovations.