Recently, one? Lang Lang said he didn't want to educate children about wolves? The news triggered a heated discussion among netizens and caused a heated discussion on the Internet. We know that with the development of society, competition becomes more and more fierce. People encourage their children to make progress, learn to compete and live up to their expectations. Moreover, with the gradual development of this social concept, many similar books have appeared, such as The Law of Wolf Nature and Team Like a Wolf, all of which are teaching people how to act like a wolf. It seems that everyone agrees with them. Recently, however, our famous pianist has played the devil's advocate. He said he didn't want to educate children about wolves. Is this idea worth learning from? Let's discuss it together.

I. Worth it

Why is it worth it? Because indeed, as a person, why should we learn the law of wolf nature? What is the purpose of learning the law of wolf nature? Increase competitiveness, why should we increase competitiveness? To put it bluntly, it is for money and social status. But do we really want to have a lot of money and a high social status? No, everyone has different values. Some people think that a dull life, working for five days and taking two days off, is a very comfortable state of life. Then why should they make a lot of money when they have reached their ideal life? Isn't making money just to live an ideal life? Why do you want to do something that makes you unhappy when you already have it?

Two. unworthy

Why not? Mainly because most of us don't have such good conditions, we should appropriately increase our competitiveness and strive for a happy life. Of course, we can live happily even without money, mainly depending on personal values.

Three. abstract

What suits you is the best.

The above is my opinion on this issue, which is purely personal and for reference only. If you have different opinions, you can leave a message in the comment area to discuss together.