First, although the law protects citizens' freedom of divorce, it does not mean that there are no restrictions on freedom of divorce, nor does it mean that divorce is granted in principle, that is, it must comply with legal provisions and moral norms. In the trial practice, we should not only protect the freedom of divorce, but also oppose hasty divorce. The purpose is to ask both parties to treat the freedom of divorce with caution. Conflicts between husband and wife are inevitable. Both sides should cherish the feelings between husband and wife and be responsible for the family and society.

In other words, the questioner of this case should not ask for divorce casually, but should treat his life with a responsible attitude towards his family and children and handle family relations well.

At the same time, there will be more or less information about the impact of divorce on children. This depends on the relationship between husband and wife. If the relationship between the two sides has reached the point of divorce, then don't kidnap the relationship because of the children.

Second, the parties must be clear that even if the two parties divorce, they cannot ignore the management and education of their children. According to Article 36 of the Marriage Law, the relationship between parents and children is not eliminated by the divorce of parents. After the divorce, the child is still the child of both parents, whether or not the parents directly raise him. After divorce, parents still have the right and obligation to raise and educate their children.

Article 37 stipulates that after divorce, for the children raised by one party, the other party shall bear part or all of the necessary living expenses and education expenses, and the amount and duration of the expenses shall be agreed by both parties; If the agreement fails, the people's court shall make a judgment. An agreement or judgment on the child's living expenses and education expenses shall not prevent the child from making a reasonable request to either parent for more than the original amount of the agreement or judgment when necessary.

Article 38 stipulates that after divorce, the spouse who does not directly raise the children has the right to visit the children, and the other spouse has the obligation to help. The way and time of exercising the visiting right shall be agreed by the parties; If the agreement fails, the people's court shall make a judgment. If parents visit their children, which is not conducive to their physical and mental health, the people's court shall suspend the right to visit according to law; After the reasons for suspension disappear, the right to visit should be restored.