Cross-professional examinations and research mainly have the following difficulties:
First of all, the review meeting for postgraduate entrance examination is an arduous course.
Interlacing is like a mountain-this old saying will run through the whole process of learning.
My original major was the worst, and I studied for three or four years, and I was exposed to it. The basic knowledge must be more solid than what I haven't learned. I may not go into the details, but the big pattern, ideas and ways of thinking all exist in my mind. Even if I surprise for four years a month before each exam, it's not useless. This is a major advantage of this major for foreign majors. On the contrary, it is the disadvantage of cross-majors relative to their own majors.
When reviewing, you should spend more time on specialized courses, so that basic courses can easily be shelved, and any backwardness in any subject will affect the mentality and test scores of the whole review process.
Secondly, you may encounter unexpected difficulties in preparing for the exam.
If you are not familiar with answering professional questions, you will inexplicably lose the points you shouldn't have lost. Moreover, after passing the written test, the uncertainty of the re-examination always makes it difficult for people with different majors to have the confidence to be "controlled", and it is really difficult to be "controlled".
Finally, and most importantly, I will live as a graduate student for the next three years.
Whether facing students with solid basic skills, tutors with certain requirements and standards, or facing a new learning career that may make you lose your coordinates for a while-how to position yourself, how to regain self-confidence, how to establish "new feelings" for new majors, and how to plan your future career and life are all problems that need to be overcome with more efforts than others.