If Lu Xun insulted China people without national spirit and became soul of china, making it the pinnacle of China literature, then Han Han is a well-deserved representative of China literature in the 2nd/Kloc-0th century. Reading Han Han's novels & gt later found himself a punk. In this novel, we can see the failure of Chinese education in China, and the honesty education in the postscript-resolutely opposing the current education system. As for where I am, as long as there is no modern education and there is something against it, I will be there. For Han Han, people's comments are rebellious and a social cancer. What puzzles me is that these are from the so-called high-level critics in China. You said he was rebellious and had to find evidence. You can't say that people are rebellious just because their hair is a little long. Liu Huan with unique personality and special hair hasn't spoken yet! You said he was a cancer because he opposed education in China. Why do you think what is right and what others think is wrong? Why can't others object to what you can support? This is the future flower of the motherland. Educated by China, it is highly developed, selfless and independent? He opposed the education system in China, and so did I. China Education didn't say it was sad to be scolded, so you exported it. If you scold your mother, won't you do it? Many education departments of Han Han can't tolerate it, because education departments often can't even tolerate themselves. How can they tolerate people who oppose him? When it comes to Han Han's favorite topic, it's really boring, so China also coined a new word-Han Han phenomenon. You say that critics in China are excellent, but I don't know why I always take care of Han Han's partiality. Han Han didn't care about it himself, and felt that there was nothing wrong with it. Does he favor you? Since there is so much time to criticize him, it is better to spend more time reading his works, why not deny others' talents and ideas without reading them? Han Han is a brilliant writer, and his thoughts are those of a normal person. As for why so many people think that their thoughts are normal and his thoughts are abnormal, it may be because they have lost their thoughts because of too much modern education and become an abnormal person without opinions and thoughts. Of course, I am a normal person, with my own thoughts, and I am not influenced by modern education. Attachment: China in Han Han's eyes was invited to participate in the recording program "Youth on Time" during the winter vacation. I have never heard of "youth punctuality" or "youth punctuality" in Shanghai before, and I want to refuse. Later, I received a fax about the content of the program, and found that these questions were quite representative. Let me make my position clear one by one, so as not to be unclear in the future, so I went.
Q: Han Han, some people say that writing is the crystallization of thinking. What are your usual concerns and thoughts?
A: Who said that composition is the crystallization of thinking? I have read many junior high school students' exam-oriented compositions, and I am very confused. Did they concretize these things? The real crystallization lies in the crystallization without examination. What I have been paying attention to and thinking about recently is what I should pay attention to and think about.
Q: Judging from your article, you really read a lot of books. One's time is always limited. As far as we are concerned, time is spent on homework. Do you usually spend time on these books? One gain and one loss, do you think it's worth it? Why?
Answer: You don't have to calculate the value. You feel happy and worthwhile. What I get will be useful for life, and most of what you get will be useless once you get your diploma.
Q: We have read your article "Take a Bath in a Cotton Jacket" published in Xinmin Evening News, saying that those who don't want to do scientific research can study mathematics in the second grade, but the reality of society is that comprehensive talents is needed, and all aspects of knowledge and talents are needed for employment and survival. Now you have considerable literary talent. Do you think your literary talent can stand in the society in the future?
A: You can't be a writer without knowing calculus? You are mathematicians who know calculus? Besides getting diplomas in exams, how many times have most people used calculus in their lives? Is such a person demeaning or flattering? If I study all kinds of unrealistic mathematics, my literary talent will overflow from brilliant to brilliant, and I will learn calculus and giant integral from brilliant to the top nine.
Q: You said that it is enough to learn math until the second day of junior high school-
Excuse me: for me, if you want to design rockets for fun in the future, don't believe me >
Q: What do you think of the future social development and social progress?
Answer: Give me a compliment. My hunger science has always been in vain and can't promote social progress.
Q: Everyone has a different way of thinking. Some people think with abstract logic, while others think with concrete logic ... Do you think reading detective stories can improve their logical thinking ability?
Answer: It is true and one-sided. To improve your logical thinking ability, don't even read detective novels.