Therefore, film reviews are best written. "I like it!" This is a film review. "rotten!" This is also a film review. The most basic function of film criticism is to express the likes and dislikes of the audience, and then, if possible, add some reasons to prove that you are not simple. Whether there is such an analysis process is not important, but attitude expression is the most important. Because if your film review is for people, then the most urgent thing for others is whether the film is good or not. Your experience can serve as a reference for him.
Many netizens said: "Oh, film reviews are so hard to write!" This mainly refers to the analysis part of the film. After watching the movie, it is difficult for the general audience to tell what style the director is, what movies he has directed, where the theme of the movie comes from and what humanistic spirit he has. But as an audience, is it necessary to talk about this? Those things just serve as a footnote to demonstrate why it is good or not. If you think you must write these things to be a "real film review", carve the radish on your plate as the main course.
In fact, movie magazines, newspaper columns, and a lot of film reviews are all foggy, which makes people feel scared and embarrassed in front of the author's film knowledge. But after reading thousands of words, I may be confused: after all that, is this film good or not? People watch movies because they are good-looking, not for film knowledge, not for film education, not for "thinking deeply".
Film criticism is divided into two ways according to style. One way is to explain the text-tell who the director is, how much the film costs, what CGI is used, where the scene was shot, whether the content is wonderful or not, what are the highlights and shortcomings. The advantage of this kind of film review is that it can quickly let readers have an overall grasp of the film and judge whether it is worth seeing through the data.