Secondly, compared with pedagogy, linguistics has a bright future. Teaching Chinese as a foreign language is a good direction if you like teaching (doing research) in universities. As long as you find a good tutor, your English is good and cheap.
Thirdly, pedagogy is not what you think, it is also a complex subject with many branches and a lot of reading. Unless you want to give up what you have learned. Because the educational theory involved in linguistics (such as English language) is far from the real pedagogy research. If you want to take the exam from the perspective of basic subject education (for example, undergraduate is an English teacher and graduate is also the direction of English education), then it is easier to take the exam, and of course you need to find a good tutor.
Go on, it really doesn't matter if it's not 985, 2 1 1. It really doesn't matter if Cobo wants to find a good mentor. But if you don't know anyone, it's not good. It is recommended to see a younger doctor, because you have no chance to get old.
If you continue to teach in two universities, you need turtles in economically developed areas now, or you need to have grades or hundreds of articles, that goes without saying. If you want to produce results in just four years, you have to rely on your mentor.
So, to sum up, as long as the tutor is chosen, everything is a cloud.
Finally, I still think that the future of linguistics is bright, especially for linguistics learners with English background. You must have a better grasp of the frontier of foreign linguistics than people with Chinese background in China. Therefore, cross-examination is not recommended, and the direction of linguistics and applied linguistics is recommended.
You can communicate again if you have any questions.