The first case: the uneducated person of the other party does not involve the most common uneducated person who harms others and social rules. Usually it is the kind of person who is very unfriendly when getting along with others, and is mean or even overbearing to others for his own self-interest or just for a moment's lip service. He neither respects the old and loves the young, nor does he know how to be kind to others, and even erupts his emotions at will. This kind of person is really annoying in life, but after all, he has not committed the crime of endangering others and undermining social rules. Therefore, our response to such uneducated people is to ignore them, and it will naturally be boring if no one responds.
The second situation: the other party's ill-education has involved endangering others and social rules, and another person's ill-education has involved endangering others or even destroying social rules, for example, hurting others because of his own interests, destroying social public safety or property, and causing safety accidents because of not obeying social rules. Then, out of social responsibility, our way to deal with this ill-bred person is to summon up courage to supervise or report to the relevant law enforcement departments to stop his bad behavior or punish him for his bad behavior.
These two situations are the way we treat uneducated people. To put it simply, we don't care about behaviors that are not suspected of breaking the law with an inclusive attitude, but we decide that we can't tolerate behaviors that are suspected of breaking the law. Only in this way can we jointly create a harmonious and healthy society. And a person's education begins at an early age, so finally, I hope all parents can attach importance to the cultivation of education when their children are young, so that our society will be composed of more educated people.