I don't think the question of education now is whether to take exams or not. But is the examination method single and suitable for modern education? Does the exam need to be reviewed in many ways? Do you need to use a variety of examination methods to adapt to the modern education that keeps pace with the times? Education in East Asia is successful. This success is reflected in the high income of East Asian education model, which has made great contributions to social progress and played an outstanding role in improving the quality of the whole society.

An exam to test the only way to fill in the blanks. There are two ways for human beings to learn knowledge: one is to learn from indirect experience and the other is to learn from direct experience. What you learn from books, newspapers, magazines and other media is the experience of others, so it is called indirect testing. The theory and law of learning is called rational knowledge, which is the basis of integrated innovation and introduction, digestion, absorption and innovation. The knowledge learned in life and work practice is called direct experience, or perceptual knowledge. This is original knowledge, which can be used for independent innovation after processing, refining and careful polishing.

If a person's education path is mainly completed by self-study and can stand the test of practice and any exam, then this person is a genius. Practice is the only criterion for testing truth, and examination is the only criterion for testing talents, because work practice itself is an examination that directly experiences talents. Education is to lay the foundation for social application. If an education provides comprehensive preparation for innovation, social practice and scientific research, can you still lie with your eyes open and accuse this exam-oriented education of failure?

The real problem of our education is that the goal of normal education is divorced from reality, with more teachers in single subject and fewer teachers in multi-subject and general subject, and the comprehensive quality of teachers needs to be further improved. The knowledge, interest and artistry of teachers' lectures are hovering at a low level. There are many commonalities, few personalities, insufficient interest cultivation and guidance, and single examination methods, which have not adapted to the needs of modern teaching and examination situations and tasks. I want to remind you that we must do a good job in public school education, including aesthetic education. Adhere to the leading role of public schools, adhere to the quality and efficiency of public schools first, adhere to the security of public schools, and so on. We should not fool around in the field of education. Private education is auxiliary, so beware of subversive mistakes in this respect.