For a long time, in the teaching of basic education, including the teaching of higher education, we have been striving for the category of course content and the length of time (including academic performance), paying attention to the foundation, extensiveness, systematicness, continuity, consistency and thinking logic of professional knowledge. In teaching evaluation, whether it is student teaching evaluation, peer evaluation or external evaluation, the amount and scale of professional knowledge of teaching professors are the first, whether the teaching time and duration of teachers are clear at a glance, and whether classroom discipline is the standard of good teaching.
It seems that the longer the teacher talks, the better, the more professional knowledge, the more coherent and detailed the system software. For example, judging a teacher's carelessness and actual effect in teaching depends on whether he fills the classroom and completes the standardized content. If the teacher only gives half of the class and shows the other half to the students, he will not bear it, and it will even be regarded as a teaching safety accident. This teaching concept has been fixed.
Not to mention the endless teaching, endless training and endless exams in junior high school, even in colleges and universities. Most teachers will also interpret the contents of textbooks and conduct tests. The teaching of the ruling university is still the center of teaching materials, classroom teaching and teacher teaching. Colleges and universities are afraid that students will learn less, learn dispersedly and learn poorly, so they peel off the specific content of teaching and mash it up to feed students.
Students' goal in class is to remember. During the exam, they can report it. In the operation of teaching evaluation in colleges and universities, Bian Xiao found that more than 85% of the examination papers in colleges and universities are simple vocabulary filling, selection, distinction and basic concepts, with only a few comprehensive skills training. In classroom teaching, it is mainly the teacher's spoon-feeding and sometimes interactive communication, that is, simple professional knowledge. Therefore, if we call this kind of cultural education basic, solid and kind, how can we talk about it? Basically, it is solid, just remember a lot of effective testing professional knowledge, and it cannot be directly related to high quality, otherwise it is difficult to express why the quality of basic education is good and the quality of higher education is poor.
According to the basic knowledge, the basic education links have laid a good foundation, and the quality of higher education should not be bad, even conducive to the promotion of higher education brands. Therefore, the view that the quality of basic education is good and the quality of higher education is poor is unfounded.