To do 10, let's say one.

After the children finish their homework, parents may wish to encourage them to explain the difficult problems in math homework. I will often send some good training questions in the group, and you can also encourage them to think about it. If they speak well, parents can also give small rewards to make their children feel more fulfilled.

Reason:

To do 10 math problems, it is better to let children "say" a problem. Primary school mathematics focuses on the training of thinking. Thinking training is alive, and mathematics will not be bad when it is promoted to junior high school. Parents should strengthen the training of children's "speaking" questions and let them express their wisdom.

Explaining questions is the best thinking training mode for children. Many parents think that math is about doing more problems, but some children make mistakes in exams, but when they encounter the same or similar problems, they still make mistakes again and again. Let the children correct the wrong questions and "say" the wrong links clearly, and the children's thinking will suddenly become clear.

Cultivate the habit of questioning.

In family education, parents should always guide their children to ask questions, learn to question and reflect, and gradually develop habits.

After the child comes home from school, let the child review what he learned that day: how did the teacher explain and how did the students answer? When the child answered, he then asked, "Why?" "What do you think?" Inspire the child to tell the process of thinking and try to let him make his own evaluation.

Sometimes, you can deliberately make some mistakes, so that children can discover, evaluate and think. Through such training, children will gradually form independent opinions on thinking and develop the habit of questioning.

Second, learn to draw inferences from others and be flexible.

The metaphor comes from Confucius' The Analects of Confucius: "It is enough to take a corner and not use three corners instead." I'll name one corner, and you should be able to think of the other three corners flexibly. If not, I won't teach you any more. Later, everyone changed this passage of Confucius into the idiom "draw inferences from one instance", which means that when you learn one thing, you can think flexibly and apply it to other similar things!

Before, I often heard parents say that they had received letters from some classmates, saying that they usually studied hard, had tutors, attended cram schools, and spent a lot of energy consolidating basic knowledge. However, I still feel that I am slow and narrow-minded during the exam, and I can only concentrate on the topic and can't draw inferences. I often feel helpless about some flexible topics.

In the training of mathematics, we must give the children inferences. A problem seems to be understood, but his thinking may be straight, and he still can't turn around without doing a few questions that are extrapolated or modified on this basis.

Inference is actually the execution behavior of the sentence "the master leads the door and learns the art in himself".

Third, establish a wrong book and cultivate correct thinking habits.

Every time I have the first class, the content of the course I talk about is related to the students' wrong questions. I usually extract several typical questions from the wrong questions in the test paper and tell them again in class as examples. The students' reaction is either unfamiliar with the topic or very familiar with it, but they have no ideas.

The occurrence of these phenomena is the reason why students did not summarize in time. So after the first class, I suggested that my students make a mistake book and record their mistakes and feelings like a diary.

Generally speaking, there are three kinds of wrong questions:

The first is a particularly stupid mistake, a particularly simple mistake;

The second is that when I got the question, I had no idea at all. I didn't know where to start solving the problem, and I suddenly realized it when I saw the answer.

The third is that the difficulty of the topic is moderate, and it is reasonable to do it right, but it is wrong.

Especially the second and third kinds, you must have put the wrong books. The advantage of establishing a wrong problem book is to master the types of mistakes you have made and prevent a mistake from becoming habitual thinking.

Fourth, be a partner in children's discussion, not a leader.

Many parents, in the process of their children's learning, intentionally or unintentionally say things that hurt their confidence, such as: How silly, how do you treat other children like your father? I wonder if you can't even do this problem by yourself? Stop school.

I admit that there are children with extraordinary thinking ability, but I feel that there are no super stupid children with poor thinking ability. It must be that the external environment is not enough for children to train in peacetime.

As parents, children's first teachers, and the most influential teachers in life, we should praise and encourage them more, and become partners in discussion with children, not teachers and managers of children.

The more you argue, the clearer it becomes. Parents should create an atmosphere of "free debate and communication" in the family. When children encounter difficulties in their studies, they should argue with each other and exchange solutions. When children get a new problem-solving method by themselves, parents should patiently discuss the uniqueness of this problem-solving method with their children with a peaceful mind.

Parents and children debate to solve problems. Free debate can help children deepen their understanding of problems, broaden their thinking and make their thinking more flexible. This is helpful to break through the inherent thinking bondage and cultivate thinking ability and quality.

Turn left | turn right

Five, graphic reasoning is the best tool to cultivate logical thinking ability.

False is true and false, true is false and true; Logical thinking is thinking under the rule, and it belongs to unconventional thinking if it is connected with life. Everything seems to have nothing to do with life, but in fact it is within the scope of laws and regulations.

The "crossing the sea from the sky" of logical reasoning can be described as varied, like a kaleidoscope, with endless changes and endless fun.