First, people live for themselves.
I have a little nephew. Because he is the first child in our family, many people spoil him. I go home every Spring Festival to buy him the most gifts, and his living expenses are also borne by my parents, and my mother usually takes care of them. My brother and sister-in-law didn't pay too much for this child, and now my little nephew is old enough to go to school.
My sister-in-law means to let him live in my city, where the educational environment is better. I agree with their demands, and I hope my little nephew can have a better future. But after the little nephew comes, the accommodation fee can be waived, but the brother and sister-in-law must bear part of the living expenses.
I have a life too. I don't have to get married now. Less pressure. When I have my own family in the future, I can't afford the expenses of two children.
Second, the nephew's life needs his parents to protect it.
My little nephew is the child of my brother's sister-in-law, and they should have the responsibility and obligation to educate this child. They should take good care of their children, and they should not shirk their responsibilities because of their own abilities, let alone pass the pressure on to others. No one is born with more needs, but everyone has done something for others.
Third, relatives should be measured.
Most family conflicts in our country are due to the lack of appropriate restrictions between relatives. Small families should solve their own internal problems and should not become big families. Relatives, such as parents-in-law, brothers and sisters-in-law, can usually contact more feelings, but not too much. The more people involved, the more chaotic life will be, and the more contradictions between people will be.
Do you think your nephew needs to pay his living expenses?