United States of America

Massachusetts Institute of Technology continues to dominate the QS comprehensive ranking, with Harvard University ranking fourth, followed by Stanford University, University of California at Berkeley rushing to 10 from 27th last year, and Cornell University advancing from 20th to 12. California Institute of Technology tied with Yale University 15, and public university-UCLA rushed into Top30!

Britain, England

The overall ranking of British institutions is outstanding, and Cambridge University continues to rank first in the UK. This year, there are still four institutions in Top 10, namely Oxford University ranked third, Imperial College London in London ranked sixth and University College London ranked ninth.

Canada

In this ranking, Canadian universities performed well, the University of Toronto ranked first in Canada, rising from 34 last year to 2 1, McGill University advanced 1, ranking 30th in the world, and the University of British Columbia rushed from 47th to 34th.

Australia

Australian university rankings go hand in hand! The University of New South Wales, from 45 last year, has now transformed into the top 20, tied with the University of Sydney 19! The University of Melbourne rose from the 33rd place to 14!

QS World University Ranking 20 10 is recognized by the IREG- International Academic Ranking and Excellence Association established by the International University Ranking Expert Group (IREG), and it is one of the most influential rankings in the world. Together with Times Higher Education World University Ranking, American News World University Ranking and World University Soft Science Academic Ranking, it is recognized as four more authoritative world university rankings.

QS World University Ranking is based on academic reputation, employer reputation, teacher-student ratio, research citation rate and degree of internationalization. It is rated as one of the most striking university rankings in the world because of its open and transparent questionnaire survey form, but it is also criticized for too many subjective indicators and commercialization indicators. Many colleges and universities lack sub-item data, and the total score deviates greatly.